added uberspace to hosting providers #1289
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1289
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "master"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Resolves: #1290
I have read and understand the contributing guidelines.
I have listed the source code.
This project is free/libre software.
This project has an associated discussion PR: #1290
https://deploy-preview-1289--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/hosting/#host
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
5c87c28c82https://deploy-preview-1289--privacytools-io.netlify.com
You haven't edited source_code.md
Where is the source code?
I find no issues with the search "uberspace".
Of uberspace?
Could you first open an issue for discussion please. im very uneasy approving stuff that have not had an associated discussion.
Just opened a discussion. It is not free software though.
Is that a problem for listing a privacy-friendly hosting provider?
Not really, mostly because people cannot see whether the open source software is really the thing that's running on the server anyway.
For me a bigger problem was the incorrectly checked boxes.
I will be opening a PR to clarify the template.
I would like to see #1196 get closed first.
I plan to launch a PR soon if we don't get any responses.
@blacklight447-ptio Are users still supposed to create a discussion issue before PR?
We are currently busy with the new browser page and email was actually the next on our list to undertake and make solid requirements for.
@blacklight447-ptio Alright, I would appreciate feedback if any of you ever have a chance.
I do not want to post a PR without any discussion on it yet. :)
I did want to re-ping you if there needed to have a discussion thread first?
Edit: I see, #1290 . - Sorry
I have looked into Uberspace's websites and attempted to DDG about them and I am fine with the inclusion (with the usual complaints about our criteria and missing warnings, but that is out of scope for this PR).
I just wish some clarifications in my review comments and then I am fine with the PR, thank you.
@ -11,0 +4,4 @@title="Data Center: Bahnhof"image="/assets/img/provider/bahnhof.png"description="Bahnhof is one of Sweden’s largest network operators, founded in 1994. They specialize in innovative data center construction: Extreme security coupled with low-cost green energy has made them world famous."website="https://www.bahnhof.net/"In https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/1290#issuecomment-534014186 they requested "Very cheap" to be changed. Where did you find the information that they are giving a .onion to eveyone?
Source?
Why so high in the file? I would put it on the bottom in the order where it has been added.
@ -11,0 +4,4 @@title="Data Center: Bahnhof"image="/assets/img/provider/bahnhof.png"description="Bahnhof is one of Sweden’s largest network operators, founded in 1994. They specialize in innovative data center construction: Extreme security coupled with low-cost green energy has made them world famous."website="https://www.bahnhof.net/"Here: https://manual.uberspace.de/web-tor.html
@ -11,0 +4,4 @@title="Data Center: Bahnhof"image="/assets/img/provider/bahnhof.png"description="Bahnhof is one of Sweden’s largest network operators, founded in 1994. They specialize in innovative data center construction: Extreme security coupled with low-cost green energy has made them world famous."website="https://www.bahnhof.net/"How about "Pay-what-you-want shared hosting with 10 GB storage located in Germany. Only email address required for signup. Every user gets free .onion subdomain."?
@ -11,0 +4,4 @@title="Data Center: Bahnhof"image="/assets/img/provider/bahnhof.png"description="Bahnhof is one of Sweden’s largest network operators, founded in 1994. They specialize in innovative data center construction: Extreme security coupled with low-cost green energy has made them world famous."website="https://www.bahnhof.net/"Thanks
Sounds good to me
Thanks :)
There just seems to be a merge conflict (I hope I didn't cause it) and GitHub doesn't email about synced pull requests, so I wouldn't have noticed this if I didn't happen to notice this on
#git:privacytools.io.I don't understand what it conflicted about looking at the GitHub conflict resolving interface, I hope you don't mind me committing (and editing your comments).