Add KeePassXC (KeePassX's community fork) #261

jonah · 2017-07-10T19:11:42Z

hugoncosta commented

2017-07-10 19:11:42 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Title, I've also added a little note saying that KeePassX doesn't have regular updates, feel free to use a shorter term to say that, I couldn't remember it. Brought up by #259.

Sidenote: The box is too small for all the text, should we just remove the update comment?

HTML Preview

http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/hugoncosta/privacytools.io/blob/patch-3/index.html

Title, I've also added a little note saying that KeePassX doesn't have regular updates, feel free to use a shorter term to say that, I couldn't remember it. Brought up by #259. Sidenote: The box is too small for all the text, should we just remove the update comment? ### HTML Preview http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/hugoncosta/privacytools.io/blob/patch-3/index.html

jonah approved these changes 2017-07-10 19:14:36 +00:00

kewde commented

2017-07-10 19:34:53 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Hmm,
The community edition does seem to have a more active development, I don't know what @Shifterovich thinks but replacing it completely might be more interesting route.

Hmm, The community edition does seem to have a more active development, I don't know what @Shifterovich thinks but replacing it completely might be more interesting route.

ghost commented

2017-07-10 19:55:01 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Wanted to suggest that, but that might require some additional feedback. I know that some people prefer KeePassX over KeePass2 because they don't like mono. But I don't know anything about the community edition.

hugoncosta commented

2017-07-10 20:21:10 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Maybe put the replace the See also with "KeePassXC and KeePassX (older)"?

kewde commented

2017-07-11 15:29:18 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I'm fine with approving this as a temporary measure but how many forks of KeePass are there?

KeePassX?
KeePass2?
KeePassXC?

I personally use KeePassX (on an offline VM), not a fan of mono either :P

I'm fine with approving this as a temporary measure but how many forks of KeePass are there? KeePassX? KeePass2? KeePassXC? I personally use KeePassX (on an offline VM), not a fan of mono either :P

ghost commented

2017-07-11 15:31:36 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

KeePass2 isn't a fork iirc. I think it's the official cross-platform successor of KeePass

👍 1

kewde commented

2017-07-11 15:35:35 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I suppose we could poll on reddit about this one?
I like the active development of KeePassXC but I hadn't heard of it before and don't know any of the devs..

I suppose we could poll on reddit about this one? I like the active development of KeePassXC but I hadn't heard of it before and don't know any of the devs..

ghost commented

2017-07-11 15:36:38 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I like the active development of KeePassXC but I hadn't heard of it before and don't know any of the devs..

Exactly. Non-maintained software is better than ill-maintained software.

> I like the active development of KeePassXC but I hadn't heard of it before and don't know any of the devs.. Exactly. Non-maintained software is better than ill-maintained software.

kewde (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2017-07-16 14:16:08 +00:00

kewde (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Will do for now.

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.

No reviewers

kewde