Free option column #26
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#26
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "free-option-column"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Adds “free option” column to emails and clarifies data.
First of all, thanks for the pull request -- your contribution is very
much appreciated.
I don't have time to check this out right now, but I will when I get
home. In all likelihood, I will submit a link to this pull request to
r/privacytools to get the communities feedback.
Alex Booker
alexbooker@fastmail.im
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016, at 06:08 PM, OKNoah wrote:
Links:
@alexbooker You are welcome. I didn't see your thread about it on reddit, but here's one: https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/41td9l/proposed_site_update_more_email_provider/
Thanks for posting that thread. I will revisit it in a day or so when more people have had a chance to see it.
@privacytoolsIO, for such a significant change, I would really appreciate your input. Thanks.
By the way, here is a screenshot.
It's really not too big a change, just a new column and clarity on two of the other columns.
It's not a big change, you're right. I would still like to see some more support though.
As you can probably appreciate, it's not strictly up to me to make changes to the site. This is a community website after all.
Thanks for your patience. Believe me when I say I am giving this due consideration!
Any progress here?
Happy belated 1 month anniversary to this pull request!
I appreciate you 1, taking the time to make these changes in the first place and 2, diligently reminding me to tend to them. I cannot promise I will merge this but I do promise to evaluate it properly this evening, when I have time.
If I remember correctly, I have three concerns:
Thanks.
I apprecaite your contribution, @OKNoah but as it stands, there are a couple of problems with this pull request. I encourage you to fix them and will help you if you need.
Problem 1: Your changes have caused the table to look quite messy:
Compare that screenshot of your fork to the current site:
Problem 2: The word "No" should have a blue background like the other occurrences of the word:
Problem 3: Please avoid text in parentheses like "(for donations)". It makes the table appear more complicated than it needs to be.
Thanks 😄!
Sorry @OKNoah, like @alexbooker pointed out it gets too messy. I'd like to keep it simple. But I also appreciate the efforts. Thanks, guys!
@privacytoolsIO @alexbooker All fixes submitted.
Agreed that it needs to be simple, but not so much that it becomes misleading. I spent a lot of time reading about or signing up for these services only to find they didn't really meet the features the table implied. Hopefully these changes save others time.
@OKNoah, I cannot see any updates to this pull request, nor can I see a new pull request 😕
@privacytoolsIO, I'm a tiny bit confused. Are you in support of this update or not?
@alexbooker Sorry, should've made myself more clear. I'm not in support of the update because of the issues you also pointed out.
@privacytoolsIO Thanks for clarifying.
Would you be on board if @OKNoah addressed the issues I mentioned (i.e. if @OKNoah added a simple free column only)?
@alexbooker I believe I must start a new PR because this one was closed prematurely.