Adding Subgraph OS in the Worth Mentioning section #195
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#195
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "patch-1"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Partially solves https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/194
That issue should be left open to track when or whether Subgraph should switch places with Trisquel.
HTML preview:
7745b5fc9d/index.html
I'd even dare to put Subgraph in the top 3.
Might need more community input there.
@kewde @Shifterovich Some feedback in the subreddit,
https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/5ha0f3/subgraph_os_adversary_resistant_computing_platform/
https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/4akqu3/subgraph_os_overview_adversary_resistant/
https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/5lakov/subgraph_os/
General consensus: It's great, but it's still alpha, "Worth Mentioning" would be the right place for the moment (until a beta or release candidate is released).
@Shifterovich I think we should consider adding Subgraph to 'worth mentioning'.
https://micahflee.com/2017/04/breaking-the-security-model-of-subgraph-os/
@Shifterovich
Micah Lee's article only shows how Subgraph's security model was less secure from a certain type of attack than Qubes OS, and not that Subgraph's model was inherently flawed.
@kewde
This issue has been sitting here for more than 4 months now, is there anything blocking it? FWIW I also agree that Subgraph should be in the top-3, but having it in worth mentioning is the bare minimum.
I'm fine with Subgraph being in the top 3 as long as Qubes is the first.
@Shifterovich Yeah, my comment was more of "we should have it at least in the worth mentioning section at first then figure out what to do next with it".
URL: OK
They made notice that Subgraph OS is still in alpha and may contain bugs 👍
If we're gonna move it to Top 3 we should replace Trisquel and switch with Debian. We'll do that later, when it's more stable.