Update Edward Snowden quotes from Permanent Record #1654
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1654
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "master"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Resolves: #none
Check List
I have read and understand the contributing guidelines.
The project is Free Libre and/or Open Source Software
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
0014396fdb
https://deploy-preview-1654--privacytools-io.netlify.com
Thank you for this PR, I checked that the quotes are correct, but the only thing I am not certain of is linking to Amazon.
As I didn't find any official website for the book, what would you think about linking to Wikipedia (or would it give spoilers) or Goodreads (I am not sure if this one is justifiable) instead?
If everyone else is fine with linking to Amazon, could the link point at least to smile.amazon.com so Amazon will donate some to charities including Tor (see question 26)?
I was unsure about linking to Amazon myself. Linking to Goodreads seems like a perfectly fine substitute.
Amazon own's Goodreads.
I would recommend linking directly to the publisher and letting the user decide where to buy:
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250237231
Thanks!
Although I’m inclined to recommend just downloading a copy online due to this:
But linking to Wikipedia seems fine to me.
I fear that would get copyright people after us, while it would be interesting how much information there can be about that.
Unless you just said (note: Edward Snowden doesn't receive money from the book)?
We probably can't link to a pirated copy of the book no. But we certainly shouldn't link to a shopfront of any kind given that all money is being confiscated.
@sgraaf, would you be able to update the link to Wikipedia? Then we could merge I think.
Is there a reason why we are choosing Wikipedia over the publishers site?
I’d think Wikipedia could be a bit more informative for users due to it containing info on the civil lawsuit, specifically that the US government “aims to capture the proceeds Snowden would be earning from [the book].”
But to be clear, this is just my perspective; updating the quote here is most important regardless I think
Fair enough
Yes. Will do so tomorrow.
Done.
LGTM