Add AzireVPN #1539
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1539
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "pr-add_azirevpn"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Don't merge yet, need to make sure the logo is up.
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
1ae49c5ff0
https://deploy-preview-1539--privacytools-io.netlify.com
As mentioned before, I am not personally super interested in listing providers that have not undergone a security audit. IVPN and ProtonMail have both committed to doing so, and releasing their results in Q1 2020. And if they don't, they will be removed here. Unless AzireVPN meets that same guideline, "mentioning" them here still doesn't make sense to me.
This is not the reason I'm blocking this PR though, if everyone else wants to list them, then whatever. I'm blocking this because links to their website should be removed. We are intentionally not linking to providers sites if they are not recommended.
They have said they are saving up for an comprehensive security audit of their network. I guess we can leave this open until they do.
I do agree though, we can't be seen to be giving special treatment.
They have been removed, that was my bad.
https://github.com/azirevpn/azclient/pulse/monthly - how come their official client hasn't seen development for over an year?
Well it might be there aren't any issues with it. It is just after-all a wrapper around OpenVPN.
I do know they're developing an iOS client, and i think focusing on WireGuard at the moment.
Looks like it’s out in beta today but no news of open-sourcing it.
Going to push this to a separate branch, so that in the future we can resurrect this PR if we need to.
From here it can be pushed to master, once the audit happens.