DNS: add Snopyta #1339
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1339
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "snopyta-dns"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Resolves: #1207
Check List
I have read and understand the contributing guidelines.
This project is free/libre software.
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
d2ba61fcb2
https://deploy-preview-1339--privacytools-io.netlify.com
I would appreciate your feedback @Perflyst based on your comments in #1207 and @nitrohorse's for knowing this table better.
@ -460,2 +460,3 @@
<span class="no-text-wrap">
<a href="https://www.digitalocean.com/">DigitalOcean, Inc.</a>,
<a href="https://www.digitalocean.com/">DigitalOcean, Inc.</a>
</span>
I guess I should remove this comma and there are a lot of excess commas with a closer look. And I thought I force pushed the privacy policy away?
@ -462,0 +480,4 @@
</td>
<td>
<a data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" data-original-title='Part of LibreHosters, "a network of cooperation and solidarity that uses free software to encourage decentralisation through federation and distributed platforms."' href="https://libreho.st/">
Informal collective
I wonder if I should call it as Snopyta DNS?
@ -462,0 +494,4 @@
</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>
<span class="no-text-wrap">
I just copy-pasted this and wonder if LibreHosters should be a type?
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
but I think similar scenarios were marked as not logging. I wonder if the title should have a warning "on normal operation" or similar (as that is in our requirements)?
Similar to a lot of others, I guess in theory I could link to Unbound source code or https://git.snopyta.org/snopyta/ but neither seems that helpful to me?
@ -462,0 +480,4 @@
</td>
<td>
<a data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" data-original-title='Part of LibreHosters, "a network of cooperation and solidarity that uses free software to encourage decentralisation through federation and distributed platforms."' href="https://libreho.st/">
Informal collective
For consistency if we do, then I think we should update these also, yeah?
I think it's also fine how it is without "DNS."
@ -462,0 +494,4 @@
</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>
<span class="no-text-wrap">
I'm not sure, maybe? Leaving the type as "informal collective" makes it easy to add future DNS that are under a different collective I guess.
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
I think if you look at Quad9, it's the same situation: we state "Some" with a tooltip regarding this type of scenario.
Yeah, I guess I'd also leave it as-is.
@ -462,0 +494,4 @@
</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>
<span class="no-text-wrap">
Ok, I guess I will let it be.
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
I need to check later, but I think Nixnet or Lelux or similar had this.
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
Everyone needs to enable logging if there is abuse and if the provider writes you an email because your server was part of a DNS reflection DDoS. If I claim I will never log than this is a lie and I also would hurt the full DNS network.
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
But ok, we can do it like this: I do never log any DNS queries.
I still can use tcpdump or similar to get the information needed to stop the abuse. Is this logging?
This seems ready for merging enough