Archived
Add US & DK as choices for UncensoredDNS #1266
Merged
theel0ja
merged 2 commits from 2019-09-03 15:39:59 +00:00
patch-1 into master
Labels
Clear labels
:mag:🤖 Search Engines
I2P
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
Tor
WIP
XMPP
[m]
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
iOS
low priority
stale
streaming
todo
wontfix
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
🆕 software suggestion
🆘 critical
🇦🇶 translations
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🌐 hosting
🌐 website issue
🏠 housekeeping
🐛 bug
👁️ browsers
👥 team chat
💢 conflicting
💬 discussion
💻 hardware
📁 file storage
📝 correction
📧 email
🔎 research required
🔐 password managers
🔒 VPN
🔒 file encryption
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🚫 Windows
🤖 Android
🦊 Firefox
🧰 productivity tools
The Invisible Internet Project (I2P)
Operating Systems
Anything covering the Tor network
active work in progress, do not merge or PR (yet)!
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
Matrix protocol
approved, waiting for a PR
Pull requests that update a dependency file
A label for stalebot if it gets added
Anything related to media streaming.
Issues or bugs that will not be fixed and/or do not have significant impact on the project.
Browser Extension related issues
Anything covering a translated version of the site
*Technical* issues with the website.
Anything primarily related to site cleanup.
Correction of content on the website
Virtual Private Network
Domain Name System
Firefox & forks, about:config etc.
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1266
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Description
Fixes #1267
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
57697c1da5https://deploy-preview-1266--privacytools-io.netlify.com
Did this PR have an associated discussion?
@blacklight447-ptio No.
@theel0ja in that case, please open an issue for discussion first.
Done, #1267
Thanks for the PR :)
I don't think we would have necessary needed a new discussion as the site had incorrect or missing information of a previously listed service instead of something entirely new being suggested.
Thanks for catching this 👍🏼