Replace Trisquel with Fedora #1156
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1156
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "fedora"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Replaces Trisquel with Fedora as a top-3 choice, moves Trisquel to Worth Mentioning. This makes a lot more sense to me as a general recommendation IMO, when I was going through the changes for #1148 I didn't really understand why Trisquel was recommended in the first place.
I would also be open to recommending elementaryOS instead of Trisquel or Fedora despite the comments against it at #1130, if we'd prefer. But Fedora is also fine. I do think it's important to have an easier recommendation, Qubes (and arguably even Debian) is somewhat extreme.
Resolves: #1130; Resolves: #449
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
3d440b0f24
https://deploy-preview-1156--privacytools-io.netlify.com
Trisquel is a popular OS recommended by privacy experts worldwide for its ease-of-use and free/libre components and support.
QubesOS is getting better. Debian was my main for a long time, install KDE and Synaptic and you are ready to go.
YUM/RPM Package Manager
Yum is basically only used in Fedora and Redhat. We used to have BlagBlag but since it has died.
I do not understand how this benefits users in any way not provided by APT or GUIX.
Fedora is for profit:
Fedora is a venture mainly by RedHat, Trisquel is a non-profit community led venture.
https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_Project
Have you ran Trisquel or Fedora? From a UI standpoint, Fedora is made for engineers.
Trisquel uses a polished user experience built for every day users.
https://trisquel.info/en/download
I have a soft-spot for elementary since it was the first Linux distro that seemed to get the UI/UX just right for me. It was also much easier to recommend to friends/family over using Windows in regards to its usability. Their privacy policy is also decent:
I don't have experience with Fedora but it also sounds like a solid recommendation. I'm just wondering if elementary would bring a healthy balance to our OS recommendations that also keeps new users to Linux in mind?
Both of which are not privacy-centric features.
Regarding the 100% free aspect, we currently recommend Debian which basically covers that use-case.
Supporting a monoculture in the package manager space seems like not the best idea. Fedora, CentOS, and RHEL are huge distros too, so saying its "only" used in those distros understates its popularity.
As I stated at https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/1130#issuecomment-520963685, Fedora is a community led project:
RHEL "owning" Fedora seems to be a common misinterpretation, but it's pretty obviously debunked.
Fedora runs GNOME. That's basically the easiest-to-understand desktop environment around. The only better DE from a purely UI perspective (IMO) is Elementary's. Trisquel looks straight out of 2012.
Agree, which is why I'd also be fine listing it, it is fantastic software. But from especially a security perspective Fedora seems to come out on top. Also we currently recommend Debian (and Trisquel for the time being), both of which are apt-based, so I think throwing another package manager in the mix is a good thing. Elementary is basically Ubuntu with another DE and custom apps, but the underlying software is the same.
The main things I like about Fedora are 1) it isn't Debian-based like our other recommendations, and 2) it has a very security-focused approach. As @blacklight447-ptio stated at https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/1130#issuecomment-520738986:
Ah, that's a good point I didn't think about. Makes sense! 👍
LGTM
Just to be clear:
https://archive.is/TwJkK
If you want a different package manager may I recommend GUIX of Pacman?