Add Minds to Decentralized Social Networks #691

2018-12-24T20:33:57Z

asddsaz commented

2018-12-24 20:33:57 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Description: Add Minds to Decentralized Social Networks "Worth Mentioning" section.
Minds URL: https://www.minds.com/
Wikipedia: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minds
Doesn't Minds support hate speech? Although, Minds doesn't censor content it does enable users to flag content that may be found offensive like nsfw. You may then opt-out/filter these.

**Description**: Add Minds to Decentralized Social Networks "Worth Mentioning" section. **Minds URL**: https://www.minds.com/ **Wikipedia**: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minds **Doesn't Minds support hate speech**? Although, Minds doesn't censor content it does enable users to flag content that may be found offensive like nsfw. You may then opt-out/filter these.

ghost commented

2018-12-24 20:37:29 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

How exactly is it decentralized?

hugoncosta commented

2018-12-25 15:10:35 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I believe the "decentralized" part they refer to is the use of an ethereum token for payments. Nonetheless, this looks like a STEEM copy to me, I'm unsure if it should be featured.

asddsaz commented

2018-12-25 19:40:27 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

How exactly is it decentralized?

If I understand correctly they utilize a decentralized video content storage and have a self-host option (I haven't used it). They also have a decentralized reward system.
I started an issue for this: https://github.com/Minds/front/issues/63
Wikipedia is a decent resource too: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minds

I believe the "decentralized" part they refer to is the use of an ethereum token for payments. Nonetheless, this looks like a STEEM copy to me, I'm unsure if it should be featured.

STEEM is more of a blogging platform, I know this is a privacy community but have you ever used Facebook? It is very similar to that.

> How exactly is it decentralized? If I understand correctly they utilize a decentralized video content storage and have a self-host option (I haven't used it). They also have a decentralized reward system. I started an issue for this: https://github.com/Minds/front/issues/63 Wikipedia is a decent resource too: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minds > I believe the "decentralized" part they refer to is the use of an ethereum token for payments. Nonetheless, this looks like a STEEM copy to me, I'm unsure if it should be featured. STEEM is more of a blogging platform, I know this is a privacy community but have you ever used Facebook? It is very similar to that.

danarel commented

2019-01-08 05:23:01 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Minds has been overrun by Nazis and has little to no commitment to protecting it's users from other users like the Federated social sites. I think it would be a bad addition personally.

https://sugarwords.wordpress.com/2017/12/21/just-some-of-the-problems-with-minds-com-the-worst-social-media-site/

Minds has been overrun by Nazis and has little to no commitment to protecting it's users from other users like the Federated social sites. I think it would be a bad addition personally. https://sugarwords.wordpress.com/2017/12/21/just-some-of-the-problems-with-minds-com-the-worst-social-media-site/

gjhklfdsa commented

2019-04-03 17:33:11 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@danarel They have a user-led censorship system. You can feel free to mark posts as NSFW.

Most Free Software social networks appear to get a lot of attention from censored groups like Neo-Nazis.

IMHO the user-led censorship opt-in/out model works very well.
As Minds matures it should only get better. :)

In my experience, networks like Reddit and Twitter are far more overrun by hate speech than Minds.

@danarel They have a user-led censorship system. You can feel free to mark posts as [NSFW](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_safe_for_work). Most [Free Software](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software) social networks appear to get a lot of attention from censored groups like [Neo-Nazis](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Nazism). IMHO the user-led censorship opt-in/out model works very well. As [Minds](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minds) matures it should only get better. :) In my experience, networks like Reddit and Twitter are far more overrun by hate speech than Minds.

ghost commented

2019-04-03 17:45:19 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Most Free Software social networks appear to get a lot of attention from censored groups like Neo-Nazis.

This will always happen, since they're the most censored group on most social media. I think Steemit is a bit better though? It's very good tech-wise and also community-wise afaik.

> Most Free Software social networks appear to get a lot of attention from censored groups like Neo-Nazis. This will always happen, since they're the most censored group on most social media. I think Steemit is a bit better though? It's very good tech-wise and also community-wise afaik.

Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) requested changes

2019-04-21 20:39:05 +00:00

Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

I didn't look at Minds deeply, but I am not sure about them immediately suggesting Android and iOS apps and I am somewhat pessimistic about cryptocurrencies by default (#798).

However the page seems to have moved to https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/blob/master/_includes/sections/social-networks.html from index.html and this pull request would need updating.

I didn't look at Minds deeply, but I am not sure about them immediately suggesting Android and iOS apps and I am somewhat pessimistic about cryptocurrencies by default (#798). However the page seems to have moved to https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/blob/master/_includes/sections/social-networks.html from index.html and this pull request would need updating.

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.

1 Participants

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#691