Adding Subgraph OS in the Worth Mentioning section #195

2017-03-07T18:33:39Z

ghost commented

2017-03-07 18:33:39 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Partially solves https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/194

That issue should be left open to track when or whether Subgraph should switch places with Trisquel.

HTML preview: https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://raw.githubusercontent.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/7745b5fc9dbdaefa0c3916f6f0fd3bf88dc87120/index.html

Partially solves https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/194 That issue should be left open to track when or whether Subgraph should switch places with Trisquel. HTML preview: https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://raw.githubusercontent.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/7745b5fc9dbdaefa0c3916f6f0fd3bf88dc87120/index.html

👍 1

kewde commented

2017-03-08 11:24:24 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I'd even dare to put Subgraph in the top 3.
Might need more community input there.

I'd even dare to put Subgraph in the top 3. Might need more community input there.

ghost commented

2017-03-10 11:10:00 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@kewde @Shifterovich Some feedback in the subreddit,

General consensus: It's great, but it's still alpha, "Worth Mentioning" would be the right place for the moment (until a beta or release candidate is released).

@kewde @Shifterovich Some feedback in the subreddit, * https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/5ha0f3/subgraph_os_adversary_resistant_computing_platform/ * https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/4akqu3/subgraph_os_overview_adversary_resistant/ * https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/5lakov/subgraph_os/ General consensus: It's great, but it's still alpha, "Worth Mentioning" would be the right place for the moment (until a beta or release candidate is released).

kewde commented

2017-07-05 22:35:21 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Shifterovich I think we should consider adding Subgraph to 'worth mentioning'.

ghost commented

2017-07-06 17:15:54 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

https://micahflee.com/2017/04/breaking-the-security-model-of-subgraph-os/

C-O-M-P-A-R-T-M-E-N-T-A-L-I-Z-A-T-I-O-N commented

2017-07-19 15:10:01 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Shifterovich
Micah Lee's article only shows how Subgraph's security model was less secure from a certain type of attack than Qubes OS, and not that Subgraph's model was inherently flawed.

@kewde
This issue has been sitting here for more than 4 months now, is there anything blocking it? FWIW I also agree that Subgraph should be in the top-3, but having it in worth mentioning is the bare minimum.

@Shifterovich Micah Lee's article only shows how Subgraph's security model was less secure from a certain type of attack than Qubes OS, and not that *Subgraph's model was inherently flawed*. @kewde This issue has been sitting here for more than 4 months now, is there anything blocking it? FWIW I also agree that Subgraph should be in the top-3, but having it in worth mentioning is the bare minimum.

ghost commented

2017-07-19 15:29:41 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I'm fine with Subgraph being in the top 3 as long as Qubes is the first.

👍 1

C-O-M-P-A-R-T-M-E-N-T-A-L-I-Z-A-T-I-O-N commented

2017-07-19 15:31:33 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Shifterovich Yeah, my comment was more of "we should have it at least in the worth mentioning section at first then figure out what to do next with it".

kewde (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes

2017-07-19 15:35:13 +00:00

kewde (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

URL: OK
They made notice that Subgraph OS is still in alpha and may contain bugs 👍

URL: OK They made notice that Subgraph OS is still in alpha and may contain bugs :+1:

ghost commented

2017-07-19 15:37:10 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

If we're gonna move it to Top 3 we should replace Trisquel and switch with Debian. We'll do that later, when it's more stable.

👍 1

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.