DNS: add Snopyta #1339
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "snopyta-dns"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Resolves: #1207
Check List
I have read and understand the contributing guidelines.
This project is free/libre software.
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
d2ba61fcb2
https://deploy-preview-1339--privacytools-io.netlify.com
I would appreciate your feedback @Perflyst based on your comments in #1207 and @nitrohorse's for knowing this table better.
@ -460,2 +460,3 @@
<span class="no-text-wrap">
<a href="https://www.digitalocean.com/">DigitalOcean, Inc.</a>,
<a href="https://www.digitalocean.com/">DigitalOcean, Inc.</a>
</span>
I guess I should remove this comma and there are a lot of excess commas with a closer look. And I thought I force pushed the privacy policy away?
@ -462,0 +480,4 @@
</td>
<td>
<a data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" data-original-title='Part of LibreHosters, "a network of cooperation and solidarity that uses free software to encourage decentralisation through federation and distributed platforms."' href="https://libreho.st/">
Informal collective
I wonder if I should call it as Snopyta DNS?
@ -462,0 +494,4 @@
</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>
<span class="no-text-wrap">
I just copy-pasted this and wonder if LibreHosters should be a type?
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
but I think similar scenarios were marked as not logging. I wonder if the title should have a warning "on normal operation" or similar (as that is in our requirements)?
Similar to a lot of others, I guess in theory I could link to Unbound source code or https://git.snopyta.org/snopyta/ but neither seems that helpful to me?
@ -462,0 +480,4 @@
</td>
<td>
<a data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" data-original-title='Part of LibreHosters, "a network of cooperation and solidarity that uses free software to encourage decentralisation through federation and distributed platforms."' href="https://libreho.st/">
Informal collective
For consistency if we do, then I think we should update these also, yeah?
I think it's also fine how it is without "DNS."
@ -462,0 +494,4 @@
</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>
<span class="no-text-wrap">
I'm not sure, maybe? Leaving the type as "informal collective" makes it easy to add future DNS that are under a different collective I guess.
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
I think if you look at Quad9, it's the same situation: we state "Some" with a tooltip regarding this type of scenario.
Yeah, I guess I'd also leave it as-is.
@ -462,0 +494,4 @@
</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>
<span class="no-text-wrap">
Ok, I guess I will let it be.
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
I need to check later, but I think Nixnet or Lelux or similar had this.
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
Everyone needs to enable logging if there is abuse and if the provider writes you an email because your server was part of a DNS reflection DDoS. If I claim I will never log than this is a lie and I also would hurt the full DNS network.
@ -462,3 +498,4 @@
<a href="https://www.hetzner.com/">Hetzner Online GmbH</a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
But ok, we can do it like this: I do never log any DNS queries.
I still can use tcpdump or similar to get the information needed to stop the abuse. Is this logging?
This seems ready for merging enough