Link to searx instances #89
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#89
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "master"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I think a link to other instances is advisable. That's one of the ideas behind searx and most users looking for searx will probably not see that there's more than one instance. Searx.me isn't neccessarily the best instance for everyone either (it doesn't proxy images by default for example). On the other hand linking to only github.io or github.com will keep the user from immediatly being able to try searx out and might scare them off. I therefore added a second button linking to the list of instances.
I'd change "Instances: github.com" to "List of instances"
Sure, I just wanted to keep the formatting the same.
It's nice to keep consistent formatting, but I think it's more clear like this.
Thanks for merging. I would vote for the GitHub link over
stats.searx.oe5tpo.com
though. I'm just saying that since the site is down occasionally and the list of instances on there is not updated very frequently or at least not completely. For exampleopengo.nl
andsearx.ch
were added to the GitHub list over a month ago andsearch.koehn.com
over a year ago but all three are missing from the site.Agreed and fixed.