Updating the Tor binary included with Ricochet #618
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#618
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "pr_ricochet-warning"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Screenshot:
Resolves: #474
Preview: http://62.102.148.154:19472/#im
@beardog108 Thoughts?
@tya99 I think it would be better if the ricochet warning was collapsible or linked to a github comment (like how we do the ipfs warning), because it takes up too much screen real estate just for people who want to use ricochet
I agree. Did you write this yourself @tya99? If not, please link to the original content instead.
Could do that however I think that might detract from how important it is. Perhaps we could put it at the end after "Related Information".
Ideally it would be great if we had foldable headings on the privacytools.io page like this for example.
Yes I did. See Issue #474 part of the reason I am reluctant to just leave it as a github comment. Should something happen to github or the repository or even the privacytoolsIO account it would be lost and not tracked within source control.
Books often have sections with info like this at the end. Maybe we could create a separate page for these things?
@Shifterovich If we still have a link that would jump/go to the section, that would be acceptable.
If we move this section to the bottom of the page, the links will work.
This depends on https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/746
We'll figure something out soon.
Done. Thanks @tya99