privacyguides/privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

Add Hardware section #616

Open
gjhklfdsa wants to merge 20 commits from gjhklfdsa/Hardware-Section into master
pull from: gjhklfdsa/Hardware-Section
merge into: privacyguides:master
Conversation 12 Commits 20 Files Changed 8 +54
gjhklfdsa commented 2018-11-25 03:55:17 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Description

Summary: Re-add Hardware Section
Why? Software is only half the privacy battle.
What are you recommending to add to the section? I would like to note finding decent privacy respecting hardware manufacturers is VERY hard, that being said, I added Technoethical, Purism, and ThinkPenguin. I made sure to add a caution tab displaying current vulnerabilities in the process of finding Open Source Hardware. These companies are all widely know in the field.
I have a suggested change! Great! Plz make a comment so that it may be reviewed. Edits from maintainers are welcomed.

Edit: Vikings.net is added to the worth mentioning.

Screenshots

selection_002

Edit: I added some worth mentioning products, tell me what you think:

privacy tools - encryption against global mass surveillance - mozilla firefox_007

<!-- PLEASE READ OUR [CONTRIBUTING GUIDELINES](https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io#contributing-guidelines) BEFORE SUBMITTING --> ## Description **Summary**: Re-add Hardware Section **Why**? Software is only half the privacy battle. **What are you recommending to add to the section**? I would like to note finding decent privacy respecting hardware manufacturers is **VERY** hard, that being said, I added [Technoethical](https://tehnoetic.com/), [Purism](https://puri.sm/), and [ThinkPenguin](https://www.thinkpenguin.com/). I made sure to add a caution tab displaying current vulnerabilities in the process of finding Open Source Hardware. These companies are all widely know in the field. **I have a suggested change!** Great! Plz make a comment so that it may be reviewed. Edits from maintainers are welcomed. Edit: Vikings.net is added to the worth mentioning. ## Screenshots ![selection_002](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/45323745/48975402-176b3600-f067-11e8-9684-40443b4f422c.png) **Edit: I added some worth mentioning products, tell me what you think:** ![privacy tools - encryption against global mass surveillance - mozilla firefox_007](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/45323745/48983701-21824880-f0ea-11e8-8811-75bc40093cc9.png)
👍 3
ghost commented 2018-11-25 08:44:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

@beardog108 I'd like to hear your opinion on this topic.

@gjhklfdsa Take a look at #331

@beardog108 I'd like to hear your opinion on this topic. @gjhklfdsa Take a look at #331
hugoncosta commented 2018-12-22 15:23:08 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Looks very nice to me, at the end of the page for the "hardcore" users. I'd just suggest that the caution be done using the alert-warning banners we use on the other sections. That'd also mean removing the links though, I'm not sure how we should do that, put them in and make this banner different than the rest or keep a comment on how to check the Open Source certification in the place it's now.
Also, taking into account Intel ME and that type of chips, I believe we could also (or instead) reformulate the caution to indicate that free as in freedom hardware is hard to find and these were our "best" alternatives.

Looks very nice to me, at the end of the page for the "hardcore" users. I'd just suggest that the caution be done using the alert-warning banners we use on the other sections. That'd also mean removing the links though, I'm not sure how we should do that, put them in and make this banner different than the rest or keep a comment on how to check the Open Source certification in the place it's now. Also, taking into account Intel ME and that type of chips, I believe we could also (or instead) reformulate the caution to indicate that free as in freedom hardware is hard to find and these were our "best" alternatives.
asddsaz commented 2018-12-23 02:50:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

@hugoncosta I think it could definitely be useful to alert the user that Think Penguin may run non-free on the device (very few of their products have been certified/endorsed) and that Purism still has non-free in the ME.
It already has a caution section.
However, I'm unaware of any issue with Technoethical.

What do you think @Shifterovich ?

@hugoncosta I think it could definitely be useful to alert the user that Think Penguin may run non-free on the device (very few of their products have been certified/endorsed) and that Purism still has non-free in the ME. It already has a caution section. However, I'm unaware of any issue with Technoethical. What do you think @Shifterovich ?
ghost commented 2018-12-23 09:55:29 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

I agree with @hugoncosta.

@beardog108 thoughts please?

I agree with @hugoncosta. @beardog108 thoughts please?
ghost commented 2018-12-23 15:57:52 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

I didn't comment before but I did look at this. I also agree with @hugoncosta.

I didn't comment before but I did look at this. I also agree with @hugoncosta.
gjhklfdsa commented 2018-12-24 05:31:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

@Shifterovich I appear to be having some compiling issues. But, it should now fully work and have warning flags.

@Shifterovich I appear to be having some compiling issues. But, it should now fully work and have warning flags.
David-Beetle commented 2019-01-04 20:46:09 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

@Shifterovich @hugoncosta @gjhklfdsa Most of the projects have RYF certification.
http://ryf.fsf.org/

This would mean that the FSF certifies them on a number of areas.
Including spyware, here is a statement by them:

Please be aware that we can't check products for spy features or back doors, but if we find out about any we will drop our endorsement unless they are promptly removed.

@Shifterovich @hugoncosta @gjhklfdsa Most of the projects have RYF certification. http://ryf.fsf.org/ This would mean that the FSF certifies them on a number of areas. Including spyware, here is a statement by them: > Please be aware that we can't check products for spy features or back doors, but if we find out about any we will drop our endorsement unless they are promptly removed.
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) requested changes 2019-04-21 20:54:02 +00:00
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

There is a merge conflict due to section splitting.

There is a merge conflict due to section splitting.
asddsaz commented 2019-05-04 04:52:58 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

@Shifterovich So where we at for this PR?

@Shifterovich So where we at for this PR?
jonah requested changes 2019-05-04 15:58:20 +00:00
jonah left a comment

Please merge gjhklfdsa/privacytools.io#2 to (hopefully) bring this PR up-to-date.

Please merge gjhklfdsa/privacytools.io#2 to (hopefully) bring this PR up-to-date.
gjhklfdsa commented 2019-05-05 23:19:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

@JonahAragon Thanks!

@JonahAragon Thanks!
netlify[bot] commented 2019-05-05 23:22:21 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!

Built with commit b6e0332293

https://deploy-preview-616--privacytools-io.netlify.com

Deploy preview for *privacytools-io* ready! Built with commit b6e0332293a11df813da90fe75c0820c183ccac5 https://deploy-preview-616--privacytools-io.netlify.com
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
jonah
Mikaela
Labels
Clear labels
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
approved, waiting for a PR
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
The Invisible Internet Project (I2P)
iOS
low priority
OS
Operating Systems
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
A label for stalebot if it gets added
streaming
Anything related to media streaming.
todo
Tor
Anything covering the Tor network
WIP
active work in progress, do not merge or PR (yet)!
wontfix
Issues or bugs that will not be fixed and/or do not have significant impact on the project.
XMPP
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
[m]
Matrix protocol
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
Browser Extension related issues
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
Correction of content on the website
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
Firefox & forks, about:config etc.
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
Anything primarily related to site cleanup.
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
Virtual Private Network
🌐 website issue
*Technical* issues with the website.
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
Domain Name System
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
Anything covering a translated version of the site
No Label
💻 hardware
Milestone
No items
No Milestone Hardware Section
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#616
No description provided.
Delete Branch "gjhklfdsa/Hardware-Section"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?