Replace DNSCrypt with DNSCrypt-Proxy #1254
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
|
|||
|
|
||||
include cardv2.html
|
||||
title="Njalla - Domain Registration"
|
||||
image="/assets/img/provider/Njalla.png"
|
||||
description="Njalla only needs your email or jabber address in order to register a domain name for you. Created by people from The Pirate Bay and IPredator VPN. Accepted Payments: Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, DASH, Bitcoin Cash and PayPal. A privacy-aware domain registration service."
|
||||
```suggestion
description="Njalla only needs your email or XMPP address in order to register a domain name for you. Created by people from The Pirate Bay and IPredator VPN. Accepted Payments: Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, DASH, Bitcoin Cash and PayPal. A privacy-aware domain registration service."
```
It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline. It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline.
I am not sure on this description.
I am not sure on this description.
* I cannot remember giving DNSCrypt-proxy any direct CLI commands.
* I think "bridges applications expecting regular DNS with servers supporting encrypted DNS" suggests that every app should manage DNS by itself, probably even DNS over HTTPS and centralize queries somewhere out of user control.
* "Can also display the DNS activity" - you mean can log DNS queries or am I unaware of some CLI?
* "locally block unwanted content." - I guess so, but I think there would be a better word that would also include forcing safe search etc. I don't know what the word would be though.
The The `operatingsystem="link"` things won't actually do anything as you can see in the preview, so I think they should be removed.
Same, should we leave off a tag line for this? Same, should we leave off a tag line for this?
Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them. Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them.
It's possible, yeah:
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from Arch's wiki and updated):
> - I cannot remember giving DNSCrypt-proxy any direct CLI commands.
It's possible, yeah:
> - I think "bridges applications expecting regular DNS with servers supporting encrypted DNS" suggests that every app should manage DNS by itself, probably even DNS over HTTPS and centralize queries somewhere out of user control.
> - "Can also display the DNS activity" - you mean can log DNS queries or am I unaware of some CLI?
> - "locally block unwanted content." - I guess so, but I think there would be a better word that would also include forcing safe search etc. I don't know what the word would be though.
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from [Arch's wiki](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dnscrypt-proxy
) and updated):
> DNSCrypt-Proxy is a command-line DNS proxy with support for the encrypted DNS protocols, DNS over HTTPS and DNSCrypt. Can cache results to improve speed, allows filtering, forwarding, and cloaking, and is compatible with DNSSEC.
That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool" That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool"
I like it, other than the last part
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself. I like it, other than the last part
> and is compatible with DNSSEC.
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself.
Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording... Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording...
I can just leave it out. I can just leave it out.
|
||||
description="Njalla only needs your email or XMPP address in order to register a domain name for you. Created by people from The Pirate Bay and IPredator VPN. Accepted Payments: Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, DASH, Bitcoin Cash and PayPal. A privacy-aware domain registration service."
|
||||
```suggestion
description="Njalla only needs your email or XMPP address in order to register a domain name for you. Created by people from The Pirate Bay and IPredator VPN. Accepted Payments: Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, DASH, Bitcoin Cash and PayPal. A privacy-aware domain registration service."
```
It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline. It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline.
I am not sure on this description.
I am not sure on this description.
* I cannot remember giving DNSCrypt-proxy any direct CLI commands.
* I think "bridges applications expecting regular DNS with servers supporting encrypted DNS" suggests that every app should manage DNS by itself, probably even DNS over HTTPS and centralize queries somewhere out of user control.
* "Can also display the DNS activity" - you mean can log DNS queries or am I unaware of some CLI?
* "locally block unwanted content." - I guess so, but I think there would be a better word that would also include forcing safe search etc. I don't know what the word would be though.
The The `operatingsystem="link"` things won't actually do anything as you can see in the preview, so I think they should be removed.
Same, should we leave off a tag line for this? Same, should we leave off a tag line for this?
Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them. Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them.
It's possible, yeah:
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from Arch's wiki and updated):
> - I cannot remember giving DNSCrypt-proxy any direct CLI commands.
It's possible, yeah:
> - I think "bridges applications expecting regular DNS with servers supporting encrypted DNS" suggests that every app should manage DNS by itself, probably even DNS over HTTPS and centralize queries somewhere out of user control.
> - "Can also display the DNS activity" - you mean can log DNS queries or am I unaware of some CLI?
> - "locally block unwanted content." - I guess so, but I think there would be a better word that would also include forcing safe search etc. I don't know what the word would be though.
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from [Arch's wiki](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dnscrypt-proxy
) and updated):
> DNSCrypt-Proxy is a command-line DNS proxy with support for the encrypted DNS protocols, DNS over HTTPS and DNSCrypt. Can cache results to improve speed, allows filtering, forwarding, and cloaking, and is compatible with DNSSEC.
That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool" That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool"
I like it, other than the last part
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself. I like it, other than the last part
> and is compatible with DNSSEC.
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself.
Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording... Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording...
I can just leave it out. I can just leave it out.
|
||||
website="https://njal.la/"
|
||||
tor="http://njalladnspotetti.onion"
|
||||
forum="https://forum.privacytools.io/t/discussion-njalla/339"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
```suggestion
description="Njalla only needs your email or XMPP address in order to register a domain name for you. Created by people from The Pirate Bay and IPredator VPN. Accepted Payments: Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, DASH, Bitcoin Cash and PayPal. A privacy-aware domain registration service."
```
```suggestion
description="Njalla only needs your email or XMPP address in order to register a domain name for you. Created by people from The Pirate Bay and IPredator VPN. Accepted Payments: Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, DASH, Bitcoin Cash and PayPal. A privacy-aware domain registration service."
```
It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline. It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline.
It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline. It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline.
I am not sure on this description.
I am not sure on this description.
* I cannot remember giving DNSCrypt-proxy any direct CLI commands.
* I think "bridges applications expecting regular DNS with servers supporting encrypted DNS" suggests that every app should manage DNS by itself, probably even DNS over HTTPS and centralize queries somewhere out of user control.
* "Can also display the DNS activity" - you mean can log DNS queries or am I unaware of some CLI?
* "locally block unwanted content." - I guess so, but I think there would be a better word that would also include forcing safe search etc. I don't know what the word would be though.
I am not sure on this description.
I am not sure on this description.
* I cannot remember giving DNSCrypt-proxy any direct CLI commands.
* I think "bridges applications expecting regular DNS with servers supporting encrypted DNS" suggests that every app should manage DNS by itself, probably even DNS over HTTPS and centralize queries somewhere out of user control.
* "Can also display the DNS activity" - you mean can log DNS queries or am I unaware of some CLI?
* "locally block unwanted content." - I guess so, but I think there would be a better word that would also include forcing safe search etc. I don't know what the word would be though.
The The `operatingsystem="link"` things won't actually do anything as you can see in the preview, so I think they should be removed.
The The `operatingsystem="link"` things won't actually do anything as you can see in the preview, so I think they should be removed.
Same, should we leave off a tag line for this? Same, should we leave off a tag line for this?
Same, should we leave off a tag line for this? Same, should we leave off a tag line for this?
Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them. Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them.
Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them. Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them.
It's possible, yeah:
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from Arch's wiki and updated):
> - I cannot remember giving DNSCrypt-proxy any direct CLI commands.
It's possible, yeah:
> - I think "bridges applications expecting regular DNS with servers supporting encrypted DNS" suggests that every app should manage DNS by itself, probably even DNS over HTTPS and centralize queries somewhere out of user control.
> - "Can also display the DNS activity" - you mean can log DNS queries or am I unaware of some CLI?
> - "locally block unwanted content." - I guess so, but I think there would be a better word that would also include forcing safe search etc. I don't know what the word would be though.
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from [Arch's wiki](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dnscrypt-proxy
) and updated):
> DNSCrypt-Proxy is a command-line DNS proxy with support for the encrypted DNS protocols, DNS over HTTPS and DNSCrypt. Can cache results to improve speed, allows filtering, forwarding, and cloaking, and is compatible with DNSSEC.
It's possible, yeah:
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from Arch's wiki and updated):
> - I cannot remember giving DNSCrypt-proxy any direct CLI commands.
It's possible, yeah:
> - I think "bridges applications expecting regular DNS with servers supporting encrypted DNS" suggests that every app should manage DNS by itself, probably even DNS over HTTPS and centralize queries somewhere out of user control.
> - "Can also display the DNS activity" - you mean can log DNS queries or am I unaware of some CLI?
> - "locally block unwanted content." - I guess so, but I think there would be a better word that would also include forcing safe search etc. I don't know what the word would be though.
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from [Arch's wiki](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dnscrypt-proxy
) and updated):
> DNSCrypt-Proxy is a command-line DNS proxy with support for the encrypted DNS protocols, DNS over HTTPS and DNSCrypt. Can cache results to improve speed, allows filtering, forwarding, and cloaking, and is compatible with DNSSEC.
That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool" That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool"
That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool" That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool"
I like it, other than the last part
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself. I like it, other than the last part
> and is compatible with DNSSEC.
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself.
I like it, other than the last part
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself. I like it, other than the last part
> and is compatible with DNSSEC.
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself.
Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording... Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording...
Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording... Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording...
I can just leave it out. I can just leave it out.
I can just leave it out. I can just leave it out.
|
||||
It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline.
It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline.
I am not sure on this description.
I am not sure on this description.
The
operatingsystem="link"things won't actually do anything as you can see in the preview, so I think they should be removed.The
operatingsystem="link"things won't actually do anything as you can see in the preview, so I think they should be removed.Same, should we leave off a tag line for this?
Same, should we leave off a tag line for this?
Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them.
Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them.
It's possible, yeah:
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from Arch's wiki and updated):
It's possible, yeah:
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from Arch's wiki and updated):
That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool"
That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool"
I like it, other than the last part
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself.
I like it, other than the last part
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself.
Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording...
Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording...
I can just leave it out.
I can just leave it out.