Replace DNSCrypt with DNSCrypt-Proxy #1254
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1254
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "684"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Resolves: https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/684
Check List
I have read and understand the contributing guidelines.
I have listed the source code.
This project is free/libre software.
This project has an associated discussion.
Netlify preview for the mainly edited page: https://deploy-preview-1254--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/dns/#dns
Code Repository (if applicable): https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
b7ac2c4caf
https://deploy-preview-1254--privacytools-io.netlify.com
Is it just me or doesn't the dnscrypt proxy not have an icon yet?
Lol wow just looking in their repo: https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/blob/master/logo.svg Found it!
seems good for merging then!
Sorry that I am not more helpful, I feel tired as it's midnight and I have been suffering migraine since I woke up.
It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline.
I am not sure on this description.
The
operatingsystem="link"
things won't actually do anything as you can see in the preview, so I think they should be removed.Same, should we leave off a tag line for this?
Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them.
It's possible, yeah:
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from Arch's wiki and updated):
That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool"
I like it, other than the last part
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself.
Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording...
I can just leave it out.