privacyguides
/
privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

Add i2p Website(s) #1033

Closed
ghbjklhv1 wants to merge 4 commits from patch-8 into master
pull from: patch-8
merge into: privacyguides:master
Conversation 2 Commits 4 Files Changed 3 +5 -1
3 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
_includes/cardv2.html
View File

@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
{% if include.tor %}
<a class="mb-1" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" data-original-title="Requires specific software to access: torproject.org" href="{{include.tor}}"><img alt="Tor" src="/assets/img/layout/tor.png" width="35" height="35"></a>
{% endif %}
{% if include.i2p %}
<a class="mb-1" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" data-original-title="Requires specific software to access: geti2p.net" href="{{include.i2p}}"><img alt="i2p" src="/assets/img/layout/i2p.png" width="35" height="35"></a>
{% endif %}
<div class="float-right">
{% if include.windows %}<i class="fab fa-windows fa-2x fa-fw"></i>{% endif %}
@ -45,4 +48,4 @@
</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>

1
_includes/sections/search-engines.html
View File

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ image="/assets/img/provider/searx.jpg"
description='An <a href="https://github.com/asciimoo/searx">open source</a> metasearch engine, aggregating the results of other search engines while not storing information about its users. No logs, no ads and no tracking. <a href="https://github.com/asciimoo/searx/wiki/Searx-instances">List of Instances</a> or try <a href="https://search.privacytools.io/">search.privacytools.io</a>'
website="https://searx.me/"
tor="http://ulrn6sryqaifefld.onion"
i2p="http://ransack.i2p/"
Mikaela commented 2019-07-16 20:30:50 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I am uncomfortable with this addition for two reasons:

  • the other links go to Searx.me, while this is suddenly another provider. Is this OK to everyone else? If so, I am OK.
  • if I understand correctly, I2P domains are first-come first-served and there are multiple different registrars so ransack.i2p can go to a entirely different site depending on who is accessing it. I would prefer using the "garlic" address http://mqamk4cfykdvhw5kjez2gnvse56gmnqxn7vkvvbuor4k4j2lbbnq.b32.i2p/
I am uncomfortable with this addition for two reasons: * the other links go to Searx.me, while this is suddenly another provider. Is this OK to everyone else? If so, I am OK. * if I understand correctly, I2P domains are first-come first-served and there are multiple different registrars so ransack.i2p can go to a entirely different site depending on who is accessing it. I would prefer using the "garlic" address http://mqamk4cfykdvhw5kjez2gnvse56gmnqxn7vkvvbuor4k4j2lbbnq.b32.i2p/
forum="https://forum.privacytools.io/t/discussion-searx/283"
github="https://github.com/asciimoo/searx"
%}

BIN
assets/img/layout/i2p.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.5 KiB