Add warning to Invidious #2182
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2182
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "Invidious-Patch"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Resolves: #2144
As described in #2144 the current box is misleading, which I agree with. To clarify why I agree with this:
googlevideo.com
as seen in the source code where they add the CSP headers when the user has not enabledlocal
.local
which is the preference to see if the user wants proxied video, is false and by default not proxied if not otherwise changed in the preference if the instance allows this, some have disabled this to be enabled.I've now added an warning however, I think the whole
proxy
aspect to this can be removed as invidious main goal is provide an front-end and not serve as proxy. I think it's good to make people aware of this as I've heard great things over invidious even to degoogle, however knowing that it's not by default proxied and some instances don't allow this is not common knowledge.Check List
I understand that by not opening an issue about a software/service/similar addition/removal, this pull request will be closed without merging.
I have read and understand the contributing guidelines.
The project is Free Libre and/or Open Source Software
Was this fully merged? I can still see the same phrasing on the web site.
Reminds me of #2135
Any ideas, @dngray?