Add Kryptor as worth mentioning. #2100

Merged
lynn-stephenson merged 1 commits from add/kryptor-as-worth-mentioning into master 2020-10-22 07:35:56 +00:00
lynn-stephenson commented 2020-10-22 07:20:35 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Description

Resolves: #2064

Check List

  • I understand that by not opening an issue about a software/service/similar addition/removal, this pull request will be closed without merging.

  • I have read and understand the contributing guidelines.

  • The project is Free Libre and/or Open Source Software

<!-- PLEASE READ OUR CODE OF CONDUCT (https://wiki.privacytools.io/view/PrivacyTools:Code_of_Conduct) AND CONTRIBUTING GUIDELINES (https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) BEFORE SUBMITTING --> ## Description Resolves: #2064 #### Check List - [x] I understand that by not opening an issue about a software/service/similar addition/removal, this pull request will be closed without merging. - [x] I have read and understand [the contributing guidelines](https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md). - [x] The project is [Free Libre](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software) and/or [Open Source](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software) Software * Netlify preview for the mainly edited page: https://deploy-preview-2100--privacytools-io.netlify.app/software/encryption-tools/ * Code repository of the project (if applicable): https://github.com/samuel-lucas6/Kryptor
freddy-m (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2020-10-22 07:35:29 +00:00
freddy-m (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

LGTM, however this page is getting rather cluttered. Perhaps a future PR should be to clean this up!

LGTM, however this page is getting rather cluttered. Perhaps a future PR should be to clean this up!
lynn-stephenson commented 2020-10-22 08:00:24 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

LGTM, however this page is getting rather cluttered. Perhaps a future PR should be to clean this up!

Could you elaborate?

> LGTM, however this page is getting rather cluttered. Perhaps a future PR should be to clean this up! Could you elaborate?
samuel-lucas6 commented 2020-10-28 08:59:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@lynn-stephenson I hate to be a nuisance, but please could you add 'free and open source' to the Kryptor description. E.g. 'Kryptor - A free and open source file encryption program for Windows, macOS, and Linux.' I think the warning symbol might make some people think it's closed source since the other warnings are related to that. Many thanks.

@lynn-stephenson I hate to be a nuisance, but please could you add 'free and open source' to the Kryptor description. E.g. 'Kryptor - A free and open source file encryption program for Windows, macOS, and Linux.' I think the warning symbol might make some people think it's closed source since the other warnings are related to that. Many thanks.
dngray commented 2020-10-28 10:44:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

please could you add 'free and open source' to the Kryptor description

To be honest I'm more of a fan of doing https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/pull/2108

> please could you add 'free and open source' to the Kryptor description To be honest I'm more of a fan of doing https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/pull/2108
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
No reviewers
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2100
No description provided.