Section introducing VPN breaches #2010

jonah · 2020-08-03T08:49:39Z

dngray commented

2020-08-03 08:49:39 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I think this is worthwhile, because VPN companies love to make these sorts of things hard to find, with their expensive mass advertising campaigns to control SEO.

https://deploy-preview-2010--privacytools-io.netlify.app/providers/vpn/#info

I think this is worthwhile, because VPN companies love to make these sorts of things hard to find, with their expensive mass advertising campaigns to control SEO. https://deploy-preview-2010--privacytools-io.netlify.app/providers/vpn/#info

👍 4

freddy-m commented

2020-08-03 09:30:51 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I also feel as if The Hated One's video on Tor vs VPN video has a place in that section seeing as we're editing this page. Otherwise LGTM!

I also feel as if The Hated One's video on [Tor vs VPN](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=6ohvf03NiIA) video has a place in that section seeing as we're editing this page. Otherwise LGTM!

dngray commented

2020-08-03 11:53:31 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I also feel as if The Hated One's video on Tor vs VPN video has a place in that section seeing as we're editing this page. Otherwise LGTM!

we could perhaps do what we did with the other VPN video and put it below that one? I did watch that video and thought it was pretty accurate.

> I also feel as if The Hated One's video on [Tor vs VPN](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=6ohvf03NiIA) video has a place in that section seeing as we're editing this page. Otherwise LGTM! we could perhaps do what we did with the other VPN video and put it below that one? I did watch that video and thought it was pretty accurate.

freddy-m commented

2020-08-03 13:31:57 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@dngray yes, that was what I meant, because I don't think it has anything to do with breaches really. Puting it next to the Tom Scott video is were it should be.

dngray commented

2020-08-04 02:49:24 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@dngray yes, that was what I meant, because I don't think it has anything to do with breaches really. Puting it next to the Tom Scott video is were it should be.

ah yeah I thought that's what you meant. See https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/pull/2011

> @dngray yes, that was what I meant, because I don't think it has anything to do with breaches really. Puting it next to the Tom Scott video is were it should be. ah yeah I thought that's what you meant. See https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/pull/2011

Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2020-08-05 09:50:15 +00:00

Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

I wonder if you might want to prepare for https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/issues/1808 by mentioning the domains or sites where the links go to as currently there is no indication for screen reader users what happens upon clicking (while not-vision impaired people can read from bottom left which domain will be visited).

jonah approved these changes 2020-09-17 14:11:25 +00:00

freddy-m (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2020-09-24 11:59:22 +00:00

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.

No Reviewers

jonah

Mikaela

freddy-m

1 Participants

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2010