Some criticism of warrant cannaries #158

jonah · 2017-01-07T15:29:18Z

Devices commented

2017-01-07 15:29:18 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I thought it would be fair to shine some light on the concept from the other side.

This reddit thread has a comment with quotes from a 2015 VPN interview by torrentfreak.
https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/45pm24/warrant_canary/

Perhaps if there is animo for it we could make a small section under warrant cannaries with more criticism?

Link to interviews (relevant information is on page 1 and 2): https://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-vpn-service-provider-review-2015-150228

I thought it would be fair to shine some light on the concept from the other side. This reddit thread has a comment with quotes from a 2015 VPN interview by torrentfreak. https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/45pm24/warrant_canary/ Perhaps if there is animo for it we could make a small section under warrant cannaries with more criticism? Link to interviews (relevant information is on page 1 and 2): https://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-vpn-service-provider-review-2015-150228

privacytoolsIO (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2017-01-07 15:29:18 +00:00

jonah approved these changes 2017-01-07 20:47:33 +00:00

matkoniecz commented

2017-03-05 16:50:52 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

by Bruce Sneier

Should be "by Bruce Schneier"

>by Bruce Sneier Should be "by Bruce Schneier"

kewde (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2017-07-19 15:36:25 +00:00

kewde (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

That was a good read!

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.

No Reviewers

jonah

privacytoolsIO

kewde

1 Participants

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#158