💬 Discussion | privacy.trackingprotection.fingerprinting isn't avalible in FireFox-esr #1010
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1010
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
The Issue:
privacy.trackingprotection.fingerprinting
is not yet avalible in many FireFox-esr versions provided by popular operating systems.Suggestion: Inform users that this segment may not be available in all version of FireFox.
Could you check which version of Firefox introduces it and when is it scheduled to come to ESR?
It landed in FF67 [see https://www.ghacks.net/2019/02/05/firefox-67-cryptomining-and-fingerprinting-protection/], and is therefore part of ESR68 which is due out next week. Just add a
[FF67+]
next to it on the siteThanks for the suggestion, I opened #1012 marking you as the author to not lose attribution.
You don't need to attribute me, and I'd rather you didn't: just point to the facts if you really feel you need to
Ok, I removed the attribution and I guess it's enough for people to be able to come here from that pull request if they are interested in the upstream issues.
^^ it's the same for the cryptomining pref right below it: see the above two bugzilla titles