continue DNS provider criteria

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md

@@ -5,27 +5,32 @@ title: "🗄️ DNS provider suggestion | "
 labels: 🌐 website issue, 🗄️ DNS
 ---
 
+<!-- Please feel free to overwrite these comments -->
+
 ## Basic Information
 
-<!-- Source code is preferred, but not required -->
-
-**Name:**
-**Website:**
-**Source:**
+**Name:** 
+**Filtering:** <!-- What is being filtered? Is it opt-in with separate address or not? -->
+**Privacy policy:** <!-- link -->
+**Protocols:** <!-- at least DoH or DoT? DNSCrypt? -->
+**Server/Location:** <!-- Where is the provider based? Where are their servers located? Anycast if there are multiple servers answering to the same address -->
+**Source:** <!-- link to the source code, preferred, but optional -->
+**Type:** <!-- Non-profit, commercial, hobby project? -->
+**Website:** 
 
 ## Description
 
-<!-- Why should we list your suggestion? -->
+<!-- Why should we list your suggestion? Anything else than already said, that you wish us to know? -->
 
 
 ### Required features:
 
 <!-- DoH and DoT are supported natively by platforms like Firefox and Android (< 9) -->
 
-* [ ] supports DNS-over-HTTPS or DNS-over-TLS
-* [ ] no PII logs
+* [ ] supports DoH or DoT <!-- We love DNSCrypt, but there is already https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-resolvers which is directly supported by dnscrypt-proxy, so we don't consider useful to list providers only supporting it.  -->
+* [ ] no PII logs <!-- TODO: read Quad9/Cloudflare/etc. to define this! -->
 
 #### Desired features
 
-* DNSSEC support
-* QNAME minimization
+* DNSSEC support: YES or NO? <!--  https://dnssec.vs.uni-due.de/ can test your current DNS provider. -->
+* QNAME minimization: YES or NO? <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->