Add Social News Aggregators #930
@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
|
|||||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/search-engines/"><i class="fab fa-searchengin fa-fw"></i> Search Engines</a>
|
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/search-engines/"><i class="fab fa-searchengin fa-fw"></i> Search Engines</a>
|
||||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/cloud-storage/"><i class="fas fa-cloud fa-fw"></i> Cloud Storage</a>
|
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/cloud-storage/"><i class="fas fa-cloud fa-fw"></i> Cloud Storage</a>
|
||||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/social-networks/"><i class="fas fa-expand-arrows-alt fa-fw"></i> Social Networks</a>
|
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/social-networks/"><i class="fas fa-expand-arrows-alt fa-fw"></i> Social Networks</a>
|
||||||
|
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/social-news-agregator/"><i class="fas fa-expand-arrows-alt fa-fw"></i> Social News Aggregators</a>
|
||||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/dns/"><i class="fa fa-tasks fa-fw"></i> DNS</a>
|
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/dns/"><i class="fa fa-tasks fa-fw"></i> DNS</a>
|
||||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/hosting/"><i class="fas fa-database fa-fw"></i> Hosting</a>
|
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/hosting/"><i class="fas fa-database fa-fw"></i> Hosting</a>
|
||||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/paste"><i class="fas fa-paste fa-fw"></i> PasteBins</a>
|
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/providers/paste"><i class="fas fa-paste fa-fw"></i> PasteBins</a>
|
||||||
|
|||||||
42
_includes/sections/social-news-agregator.html
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
<h1 id="obb" class="anchor"><a href="#social-news-agregator"><i class="fas fa-link anchor-icon"></i></a> Social News Aggregators</h1>
|
||||||
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
<div class="alert alert-warning" role="alert">
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
<strong>If you are currently using a online bulletin board like Reddit, you should pick an alternative here.</strong>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
</div>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
<div class="row mb-2">
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
{% include cardv2.html color="success"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
title="Aether"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
image="/assets/img/tools/aether.png"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
url="https://github.com/nehbit/aether"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
I think the GitHub link here is inconsistent between everything else. Why not link to https://getaether.net/ ? I think the GitHub link here is inconsistent between everything else. Why not link to https://getaether.net/ ?
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
@Mikaela I thought their GitHub repo listed more links and made it easier for users to start using. However, if the overall consensus is to list their homepage, I wouldn't mind changing it. @Mikaela I thought their GitHub repo listed more links and made it easier for users to start using. However, if the overall consensus is to list their homepage, I wouldn't mind changing it.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
footer="OS: Windows, macOS, Linux, Source."
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
description='Aether is a <a href="https://github.com/nehbit/aether/blob/master/LICENSE.md">free/libre and open source</a> decentralized social news aggregator with a built in voting system.'
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
%}
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
{% include cardv2.html color="primary"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
title="Tildes"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
image="/assets/img/tools/tildes.png"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
url="https://tildes.net"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
footer="OS: Windows, macOS, Linux, BSD, Web, Source."
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
description='Tildes is a web-based decentralized online bulletin board. It is licensed under <a href="https://gitlab.com/tildes/tildes/blob/master/LICENSE">GPL 3.0</a>.'
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
%}
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
{% include cardv2.html color="warning"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
title="Raddle"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
image="/assets/img/tools/raddle.png"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
url="https://raddle.me"
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
footer="OS: Windows, macOS, Linux, BSD, Web, Source."
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
description="Raddle is a public Postmill instance focused on privacy and anti-censorship."
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
%}
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
</div>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
<h3>Worth Mentioning</h3>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
<ul>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
<li><a href="https://beta.akasha.world/">Akasha</a> - A decentralized online bulletin board using <a href="https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/InterPlanetary_File_System">IPFS</a> and <a href="https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethereum">Ethereum</a>.</li>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
<li><a href="https://dev.lemmy.ml/">Lemmy</a> - An <a href="https://github.com/dessalines/lemmy/blob/master/LICENSE">AGPL</a> licensed self-hostable link aggregator intended to work in the <a href="https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse">Fediverse</a>.</li>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
<li><a href="https://notabug.io/">notabug.io</a> - notabug.io is a <a href="https://github.com/notabugio/notabug/blob/master/LICENSE.md">free and open source</a> p2p link aggregator with a strong resemblance to old.reddit.com (not to be confused with <a href="https://notabug.org/">NotABug.org</a>).</li>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
|
</ul>
|
||||||
|
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through. I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
> Be human, nice, respectful and constructive.
> Don't be a pain in the ass and full of hate.
> No porn, piracy, spam, hate speech, brigading, gore, doxing, racism and any kind of discrimination.
* https://social.privacytools.io/about/more
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code. They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion, @Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses [non-free code](https://github.com/voat/voat/blob/Core/LICENSE).
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here. We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in I think you forgot this here.
* https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
* 
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in `#general:privacytools.io` by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue. Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code. While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by. As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version. If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue. > I think you forgot this here.
>
> * https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
> * 
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
> by the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) vs [NotABug](https://notabug.org) can be a very polarized issue.
[Gitlab](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GitLab) as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like [GNU Savannah](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Savannah), [OurProject](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ourproject.org), and [NotABug](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/) are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does [NotABug](https://notabug.org) run [Gogs](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Gogs), it runs a ["liberated" version](https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/).
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with [Github](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/github). :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already. > If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
> Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have _at least_ two issues on that already.
|
|||||||
BIN
assets/img/tools/aether.png
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 5.7 KiB |
BIN
assets/img/tools/raddle.png
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 12 KiB |
BIN
assets/img/tools/tildes.png
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 8.7 KiB |
@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ permalink: /classic/
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
{% include sections/social-networks.html %}
|
{% include sections/social-networks.html %}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{% include sections/social-news-agregator.html %}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{% include sections/dns.html %}
|
{% include sections/dns.html %}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{% include sections/notebooks.html %}
|
{% include sections/notebooks.html %}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
8
pages/providers/social-news-agregator.html
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
layout: page
|
||||||
|
permalink: /providers/social-news-agregator/
|
||||||
|
title: "Social News Agregator"
|
||||||
|
description: "Online Bulletin Boards"
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{% include sections/social-news-agregator.html %}
|
||||||
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
I see a conflict between Privacytools.io and Voat.co.
I fear I would see worse if I started clicking through.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code.
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
@Mikaela To be clear, I do not recall being nice listed any where in the software criteria or contributing guidelines. However, while looking around I noticed Voat uses non-free code.
They also utilize CloudFlare. So, unless there is anyone else here with a different opinion,
I will retract Voat from my PR.
I think you forgot this here.
https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in
#general:privacytools.ioby the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...I think you forgot this here.
https://deploy-preview-930--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/social-news-agregator/
We had a confused chat on notabug.org and notabug.io a few days ago in
#general:privacytools.ioby the way, I offered gitlab.privacytools.io as an alternative to notabug.io prompting question what does Gitlab have to do with Notabug and I was wondering if Notabug is not running Cogs...Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue.
Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version.
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
Thanks! Issue should be fixed.
Gitlab vs NotABug can be a very polarized issue.
Gitlab as I understand it, only partially has opened up their server side code.
While alternatives like GNU Savannah, OurProject, and NotABug are generally more respecting of the free software principles many of its repos stand by.
As for does NotABug run Gogs, it runs a "liberated" version.
If you want to discuss this further I think it would be a great issue.
Lots of stuff is wrong with Github. :)
I think we have at least two issues on that already.
I think we have at least two issues on that already.