privacyguides
/
privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

Hardware Section! #1713

Open
jonah wants to merge 15 commits from hardware into master
pull from: hardware
merge into: privacyguides:master
Conversation 44 Commits 15 Files Changed 15 +3 -2
4 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit f32b63eb53 - Show all commits

1
_includes/nav.html
View File

@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
<span class="nav-dropdown">
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/hardware/#mobile"><span class="fas fa-mobile-alt fa-fw"></span> Mobile Devices</a>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/hardware/#u2f"><span class="fas fa-key fa-fw"></span> U2F Security Keys</a>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/hardware/#routers"><span class="fas fa-network-wired fa-fw"></span> Routers</a>
</span>
</details>

4
_includes/sections/hardware.html
View File

@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="row mb-2">
<div class="col-lg-3 col-sm-12 pt-lg-5">
<img
src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3-xl.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
data-theme-src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3-xl.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
data-theme-src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
height="200"
width="200"
class="img-fluid d-block mr-auto ml-auto align-middle"

jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>

BIN
assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3-xl.png vendored
View File

Binary file not shown.

BIN
assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3.png vendored Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 24 KiB