Hardware Section! #1713
|
|
@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
|
|||
|
|
||||
<h5><span class="badge badge-success">GrapheneOS Support</span></h5>
|
||||
<p>The Google Pixel supports GrapheneOS, the free and open-source mobile operating system <a href="/operating-systems/#mobile_os">we currently recommend</a> for use on mobile devices.</p>
|
||||
<p>Note that using a custom Android operating system means you have to make the compromise between app availibility and stability, and having decent security and privacy. This operating system does not come with Google Play Services by default, nor is it possible to install Google Play Services or microG. We recommend using F-Droid for app installations as needed, and to avoid third-party apps as much as possible. For this reason, a Pixel with GrapheneOS may not be the best choice for less technical users and users requiring the use of many third-party apps.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
<h5><span class="badge badge-success">Titan M</span></h5>
|
||||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
<p>The Google Pixel 3 has a new hardware security chip, the Titan M, making it more secure than its predecessors or other Android devices. This chip is tasked with protecting your device against boot-time attacks, too many log-in attempts, and secure data storage, among other security-related processes. Unlike other mobile hardware security solutions such as ARM TrustZone, the Titan M is a dedicated chip with physically separate RAM and processing power, preventing sidechannel attacks (a la Spectre, Meltdown, Rowhammer).</p>
|
||||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
I'd suggest changing this:
Samsung Galaxy S3
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.to something like this:
Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II
(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
I'd suggest changing this:
Samsung Galaxy S3
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.to something like this:
Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II
(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
We can still change this:
Samsung Galaxy S3
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.to something like this:
Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
We can still change this:
Samsung Galaxy S3
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.to something like this:
Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.