Hardware Section! #1713
|
|
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
|
|||
|
|
||||
alt="Pixel 3 XL">
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="col">
|
||||
<h2>Google Pixel</h2>
|
||||
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
<h2>Google Pixel 3</h2>
|
||||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
<p>The <strong>Google Pixel 3/3 XL</strong> and the <strong>Google Pixel 3a/3a XL</strong> are the only secure Android devices currently on the market that can be made privacy-respecting. They have hardware-backed keystores, verified boot functionality <em>with custom ROMs</em>, attestation support, as well as proper ongoing support for their firmware and proper ongoing support for software specific to the hardware used in the device, which is necessary for <em>complete</em> security updates.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h5><span class="badge badge-danger">Google OS</span></h5>
|
||||
|
|
@ -40,14 +40,15 @@
|
|||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
<div class="col">
|
||||
<h2>iPhone 11</h2>
|
||||
<p>The <strong>iPhone 11 Pro</strong> and the <strong>iPhone 11</strong> are the most secure and tested mobile devices on the market. They support verified boot, strong sandboxing, and strong hardware security (Secure Enclave). They also receive regular and frequent security updates, and they will receive updates far longer than competing Android devices.</p>
|
||||
<p>An iPhone does not make people compromise between the avalibility of third-party apps and having strong security and privacy from their device.
|
||||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
<p>An iPhone does not make people compromise between the avalibility of third-party apps and having strong security and privacy from their device. Therefore we believe it is the most suitable option for less technical users, or users looking for a better out-of-the-box experience.</p>
|
||||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
|
||||
<h5><span class="badge badge-danger">iCloud</span></h5>
|
||||
<p>It is important to note that iOS comes with numerous iCloud integrations, many of which are enabled by default. We recommend advoiding the use of iCloud whenever possible to avoid your personal information being stored on Apple's servers, and we only recommend the use of an Apple ID for App Store use.</p>
|
||||
<p>Contrary to popular belief, iCloud device backups are currently <strong>not</strong> End-to-End Encrypted. You should only backup your device using iTunes.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h5><span class="badge badge-success">No Known Exploits</span></h5>
|
||||
<p>There are no <em>known, major hardware</em> exploits for the iPhone 11 series, making them a safer choice over older iPhone models. All iPhone models up to and including the iPhone X are affected by <strong>checkm8</strong>, a permanent unpatchable bootrom exploit that <em>may</em> compromise your device's security.</p>
|
||||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
<p>There are no known, major <em>hardware</em> exploits for the iPhone 11 series, making them a safer choice over older iPhone models. All iPhone models up to and including the iPhone X are affected by <strong>checkm8</strong>, a permanent unpatchable bootrom exploit that <em>may</em> compromise your device's security.</p>
|
||||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
<p>This does not mean an exploit is impossible: <strong>unc0ver</strong> is an iOS 13 software exploit that affects even the iPhone 11, however it has been patched in iOS 13.3.1. Always keeping your device up-to-date is the most important step to take to keep your devices secure.</p>
|
||||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
I'd suggest changing this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux. other links: **I'd suggest changing this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
___
IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882).
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue. The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah
commented
Thanks, done (issue # 1742). We can still change this: Samsung Galaxy S3 to something like this: Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
**We can still change this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
**to something like this:**
<a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
|
||||
I'd suggest changing this:
Samsung Galaxy S3
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.to something like this:
Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II
(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
I'd suggest changing this:
Samsung Galaxy S3
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.to something like this:
Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II
(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.
other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os
If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
We can still change this:
Samsung Galaxy S3
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.to something like this:
Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.Thanks, done (issue # 1742).
We can still change this:
Samsung Galaxy S3
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.to something like this:
Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II
(ReplicantOS)- This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.