privacyguides
/
privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

Hardware Section! #1713

Open
jonah wants to merge 15 commits from hardware into master
pull from: hardware
merge into: privacyguides:master
Conversation 44 Commits 15 Files Changed 15 +109
8 changed files with 109 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit 842964dfea - Show all commits

14
_includes/nav.html
View File

@ -77,6 +77,20 @@
</span>
</details>
<!-- Hardware -->
<details class="nav-details">
<summary>
<span class="nav-summary">
Hardware
<span class="dropdown-toggle"></span>
</span>
</summary>
<span class="nav-dropdown">
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/hardware/#mobile"><span class="fas fa-mobile-alt fa-fw"></span> Mobile Devices</a>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/hardware/#u2f"><span class="fas fa-key fa-fw"></span> U2F Security Keys</a>
</span>
</details>
<!-- OS -->
<details class="nav-details">
<summary>

87
_includes/sections/hardware.html Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h1 id="mobile" class="anchor"><a href="#mobile"><i class="fas fa-link anchor-icon"></i></a> Mobile Hardware</h1>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p><em><strong>A note from the team:</strong> It is important to remember that you can only truly have privacy if the devices you use are secure. This includes security against both remote and physical attackers, and passive and active attacks. In the mobile computing space this dramatically limits your available options to devices that many would consider to be unsafe by default. You will need to make both software and lifestyle modifications to make these devices privacy-respecting. If you are unable or unwilling to do so, consider using mobile devices as little as possible, as they are at odds with your privacy almost by design. Please understand that we will never recommend any "privacy-respecting" mobile hardware that sacrifices your security.</em></p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="container-fluid">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="row mb-2">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="col-lg-3 col-sm-12 pt-lg-5">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<img
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3-xl.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
data-theme-src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3-xl.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
height="70"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
width="200"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
class="img-fluid d-block mr-auto ml-auto align-middle"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
alt="Pixel 3 XL">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="col">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h2>Google Pixel</h2>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>The <strong>Google Pixel 3/3 XL</strong> and the <strong>Google Pixel 3a/3a XL</strong> are the only secure Android devices currently on the market that can be made privacy-respecting. They have hardware-backed keystores, verified boot functionality <em>with custom ROMs</em>, attestation support, as well as proper ongoing support for their firmware and proper ongoing support for software specific to the hardware used in the device, which is necessary for <em>complete</em> security updates.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h5><span class="badge badge-danger">Google OS</span></h5>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>Google Pixel devices come with a modified version of Android specific to Pixel devices. This software comes with added functionality specific to Pixel devices, but also is heavily linked with Google and Google Play Services. Using the stock ROM on a Google Pixel device is <em>strongly discouraged</em>. We recommend the use of either GrapheneOS or LineageOS to "de-Google" your device.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h5><span class="badge badge-success">GrapheneOS Support</span></h5>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>The Google Pixel supports GrapheneOS, the free and open-source mobile operating system <a href="/operating-systems/#mobile_os">we currently recommend</a> for use on mobile devices.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>Note that using a custom Android operating system means you have to make the compromise between app availibility and stability, and having decent security and privacy. This operating system does not come with Google Play Services by default, nor is it possible to install Google Play Services or microG. We recommend using F-Droid for app installations as needed, and to avoid third-party apps as much as possible. For this reason, a Pixel with GrapheneOS may not be the best choice for less technical users and users requiring the use of many third-party apps.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="row mb-2">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="col-lg-3 col-sm-12 pt-lg-5">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<img
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/iphone-11-pro.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
data-theme-src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/iphone-11-pro.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
height="70"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
width="200"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
class="img-fluid d-block mr-auto ml-auto align-middle"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
alt="Mullvad">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="col">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h2>iPhone 11</h2>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>The <strong>iPhone 11 Pro</strong> and the <strong>iPhone 11</strong> are the most secure and tested mobile devices on the market. They support verified boot, strong sandboxing, and strong hardware security (Secure Enclave). They also receive regular and frequent security updates, and they will receive updates far longer than competing Android devices.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>An iPhone does not make people compromise between the avalibility of third-party apps and having strong security and privacy from their device.
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h5><span class="badge badge-danger">iCloud</span></h5>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>It is important to note that iOS comes with numerous iCloud integrations, many of which are enabled by default. We recommend advoiding the use of iCloud whenever possible to avoid your personal information being stored on Apple's servers, and we only recommend the use of an Apple ID for App Store use.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>Contrary to popular belief, iCloud device backups are currently <strong>not</strong> End-to-End Encrypted. You should only backup your device using iTunes.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h5><span class="badge badge-success">No Known Exploits</span></h5>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>There are no <em>known, major hardware</em> exploits for the iPhone 11 series, making them a safer choice over older iPhone models. All iPhone models up to and including the iPhone X are affected by <strong>checkm8</strong>, a permanent unpatchable bootrom exploit that <em>may</em> compromise your device's security.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h3>Worth Mentioning</h3>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<ul>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<li><a href="https://devices.ubuntu-touch.io/device/FP2">Fairphone 2</a> <span class="badge badge-info">Ubuntu Touch</span> - The Fairphone 2 is an interesting look into modular, ethical, and sustainable mobile devices with an emphasis on open source. This our preferred hardware if you wish to run Ubuntu Touch, however using older and less tested hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<li><a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> <span class="badge badge-info">ReplicantOS</span> - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</ul>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h1 id="u2f" class="anchor"><a href="#u2f"><i class="fas fa-link anchor-icon"></i></a> U2F Security Keys</h1>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
{% include cardv2.html
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
title="YubiKey 5"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
image="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/yubikey-5c.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
description='The YubiKey 5 is a multi-protocol security key, providing strong two-factor, multi-factor and passwordless authentication, and seamless touch-to-sign. It supports FIDO2, FIDO U2F, one-time password (OTP), OpenPGP, and smart card functionality. It is available in a variety of form factors for desktop or laptop.'
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
website="https://www.yubico.com/products/yubikey-5-overview/"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
github="https://github.com/yubico"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
%}
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
{% include cardv2.html
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
title="Yubico Security Key"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
image="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/yubico-security-key.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
description='The Yubico Security Key is a budget option for secure two-factor authentication, supporting the U2F and FIDO2 protocols to protect your accounts against remote takeovers.'
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
website="https://www.yubico.com/products/security-key/"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
github="https://github.com/yubico"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
%}
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
{% include cardv2.html
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
title="SoloKeys"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
image="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/solokey.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
description='The SoloKey is the "first open-source FIDO2 security key", available in both USB-A and USB-C variants with optional NFC capability for mobile devices.'
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
website="https://solokeys.com/"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
github="https://github.com/solokeys"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
%}
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>

BIN
assets/img/png/3rd-party/iphone-11-pro.png vendored Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 34 KiB

BIN
assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3-xl.png vendored Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 18 KiB

BIN
assets/img/png/3rd-party/solokey.png vendored Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 12 KiB

BIN
assets/img/png/3rd-party/yubico-security-key.png vendored Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 14 KiB

BIN
assets/img/png/3rd-party/yubikey-5c.png vendored Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 19 KiB

8
pages/hardware.html Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
---
layout: page
permalink: /hardware/
title: "Hardware"
description: "Your privacy is only as strong as the devices you use."
---
{% include sections/hardware.html %}