privacyguides
/
privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

Hardware Section! #1713

Open
jonah wants to merge 15 commits from hardware into master
pull from: hardware
merge into: privacyguides:master
Conversation 44 Commits 15 Files Changed 15 +34 -3
2 changed files with 34 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit 233c9b59a3 - Show all commits

37
_includes/sections/hardware.html
View File

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<img
src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3-xl.png"
data-theme-src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/pixel-3-xl.png"
height="70"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
height="200"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
width="200"
class="img-fluid d-block mr-auto ml-auto align-middle"
alt="Pixel 3 XL">
@ -35,10 +35,10 @@
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<img
src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/iphone-11-pro.png"
data-theme-src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/iphone-11-pro.png"
height="70"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
height="200"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
width="200"
class="img-fluid d-block mr-auto ml-auto align-middle"
alt="Mullvad">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
alt="iPhone 11 Pro">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
<div class="col">
<h2>iPhone 11</h2>
@ -89,3 +89,34 @@ description='The SoloKey is the "first open-source FIDO2 security key", availabl
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
website="https://solokeys.com/"
github="https://github.com/solokeys"
%}
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h1 id="routers" class="anchor"><a href="#routers"><i class="fas fa-link anchor-icon"></i></a> Home Routers</h1>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="container-fluid">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="row mb-2">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="col-lg-3 col-sm-12 pt-lg-5 text-center">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<img
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/turris-omnia.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
data-theme-src="/assets/img/png/3rd-party/turris-omnia.png"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
height="200"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
width="200"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
class="img-fluid d-block mr-auto ml-auto align-middle"
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
alt="Turris Omnia">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<a class="btn btn-primary mt-4" href="https://www.turris.cz/en/omnia/" role="button"><i class="fas fa-external-link-alt fa-fw"></i> Website</a>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<div class="col">
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h2>Turris Omnia</h2>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p><strong>Turris Omnia</strong> is a secure, high performance, and open-source home router. It has specifications that would allow it to easily handle Gigabit-level networking, as well as additional functionality (NAS, printserver, or other server type use-cases).</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>Turris Omnia was created by <strong>NIC.CZ</strong>, the non-profit .CZ domain registry behind many massive internet open-source projects including Knot (DNS Server), BIRD (Internet routing daemon), and FRED (Domain registry platform). As such, we believe they have the experience required to make a secure routing platform.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h5><span class="badge badge-success">OpenWrt</span></h5>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>Turris Omnia runs OpenWrt, the router operating system platform <a href="/operating-systems/#firmware">we recommend</a> for home users. It is an incredibly lightweight operating system perfect for this workload, and it is well supported by its developers.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h5><span class="badge badge-success">Secure Defaults</span></h5>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>Turris Omnia is configured securely and privately by default. It also features <strong>automatic updates</strong> that require no user interaction. The lack of updates is a security problem for most home router brands.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<h5><span class="badge badge-info">Additional Functionality</span></h5>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
<p>This device can be used for more than just routing. It is a highly extensible product, allowing you to do things like add mSATA storage. It features a SIM slot that can be used alongside an LTE USB or miniPCIe modem for backup connectivity. It comes with a "virtual server", which allows you to install normal Linux applications or even entirely seperate Linux distros like Ubuntu or Debian independently of the main software, improving security and allowing for safe software experimentation.</p>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
</div>
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>

jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 11:01:18 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

I'd suggest changing this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both have modem isolation and are capable of running mainline Linux.

other links:
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305)
https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)

**I'd suggest changing this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="#IDK to what should we link here#">Samsung Galaxy S3 or Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS) (postmarketOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS or if you want to run a GNU/Linux mobile OS such as postmarketOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> ___ IDK if Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II are any worse than the Pinephone or the Librem 5, they both [have modem isolation](https://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php) and are capable of [running mainline Linux](https://redmine.replicant.us/issues/1882). other links: https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_SIII_LTE_(samsung-i9305) https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Galaxy_Note_II_(samsung-n7100)
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-02-28 16:53:15 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os

If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.

The worth mentioning devices were specifically chosen because of our recommendations here: https://www.privacytools.io/operating-systems/#mobile_os If you want PostmarketOS recommended, that is worth opening as a separate software issue.
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>
jonah commented 2020-03-04 15:53:32 +00:00
Review
Copy Link

Thanks, done (issue # 1742).

We can still change this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

to something like this:

Samsung Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note II (ReplicantOS) - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.

Thanks, done (issue # 1742). **We can still change this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li> **to something like this:** <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyS3I9300">Samsung Galaxy S3</a> and <a href="https://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/GalaxyNote2N7100">Galaxy Note II</a> `(ReplicantOS)` - This is the best hardware available if you wish to run ReplicantOS, however using older hardware like this inherently forces you to make significant security and usability compromises.</li>

BIN
assets/img/png/3rd-party/turris-omnia.png vendored Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 28 KiB