privacyguides/privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

hosting-provider: add a quick warning #1464

Closed
Mikaela wants to merge 3 commits from hosting-warning into master
pull from: hosting-warning
merge into: privacyguides:master
Conversation 13 Commits 3 Files Changed 1 +1 -1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit 2218fe0fc3 - Show all commits

2
_includes/sections/hosting-provider.html
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Mikaela commented 2019-11-11 09:37:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?
Mikaela commented 2019-11-11 09:37:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?
nitrohorse commented 2019-11-12 00:54:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.
nitrohorse commented 2019-11-12 00:54:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:27:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link
  <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong>

Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.

```suggestion <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong> ``` Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:27:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link
  <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong>

Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.

```suggestion <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong> ``` Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:28:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Changed to read, please rereview

Changed to read, please rereview
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:28:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Changed to read, please rereview

Changed to read, please rereview
<h1 id="host" class="anchor"><a href="#host"><i class="fas fa-link anchor-icon"></i></a> Secure Hosting Provider</h1> <h1 id="host" class="anchor"><a href="#host"><i class="fas fa-link anchor-icon"></i></a> Secure Hosting Provider</h1>
<div class="alert alert-warning" role="alert"> <div class="alert alert-warning" role="alert">
<strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it.</strong> <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please verify their privacy policies.</strong>
Mikaela commented 2019-11-11 09:37:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?
nitrohorse commented 2019-11-12 00:54:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:27:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link
  <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong>

Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.

```suggestion <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong> ``` Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:28:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Changed to read, please rereview

Changed to read, please rereview
Mikaela commented 2019-11-11 09:37:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?
nitrohorse commented 2019-11-12 00:54:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:27:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link
  <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong>

Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.

```suggestion <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong> ``` Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:28:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Changed to read, please rereview

Changed to read, please rereview
</div> </div>
{% include cardv2.html {% include cardv2.html
Mikaela commented 2019-11-11 09:37:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?
Mikaela commented 2019-11-11 09:37:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?

I committed this, but would "read" make more sense than "verify" ?
nitrohorse commented 2019-11-12 00:54:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.
nitrohorse commented 2019-11-12 00:54:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.

I meant verifying their claims on their main home pages, but yeah “read” probably is more clear.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:27:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link
  <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong>

Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.

```suggestion <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong> ``` Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:27:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link
  <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong>

Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.

```suggestion <strong>Note: We cannot know what the hosting providers are doing and have to take their word on it. Please read their privacy policies.</strong> ``` Lazy suggestion, so I don't have to terminal it.
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:28:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Changed to read, please rereview

Changed to read, please rereview
Mikaela commented 2019-11-12 12:28:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Changed to read, please rereview

Changed to read, please rereview