Convert File Sync to cardv2, update navbar title #1308
@ -68,10 +68,10 @@
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/email/"><span class="fas fa-envelope fa-fw"></span> Email Clients</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/encryption-tools/"><span class="fas fa-lock fa-fw"></span> File Encryption</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/file-sharing/"><span class="fas fa-file-export fa-fw"></span> File Sharing</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/file-sync/"><span class="fas fa-copy fa-fw"></span> File Sync</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/passwords/"><span class="fas fa-user-lock fa-fw"></span> Password Manager</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/productivity/"><span class="fas fa-briefcase fa-fw"></span> Productivity Tools</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/real-time-communication/"><span class="fas fa-comments fa-fw"></span> Real-Time Communication</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/file-sync/"><span class="fas fa-copy fa-fw"></span> Secure File Sync</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/networks/"><span class="fas fa-user-secret fa-fw"></span> Self-contained Networks</a>
|
||||
<a class="dropdown-item" href="/software/cloud/"><span class="fas fa-hdd fa-fw"></span> Self-Hosted Cloud Server</a>
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
|
||||
<a href="#sync">
|
||||
<i class="fas fa-link anchor-icon"></i>
|
||||
</a>
|
||||
Secure File Sync Software
|
||||
TODO TODO
TODO TODO
I didn't add a Windows link because it's not maintained anymore. I didn't add a Windows link because it's [not maintained anymore](https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/issues/1909#issuecomment-526943216).
Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already. Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already.
Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so. Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so.
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
- Individual sync conditions can be applied per device and per folder
- Recent changes UI, click to open files.
- "Battery eater" problem is fixed.
- Android 8 and 9 support.
We can address its removal in a separate PR 👍 We can address its removal in a separate PR :+1:
```suggestion
description="<strong>Syncthing</strong> replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and decentralized. Your data is your data alone and you deserve to choose where it is stored, if it is shared with some third-party and how it's transmitted over the Internet."
```
|
||||
File Sync
|
||||
|
TODO TODO
TODO TODO
I didn't add a Windows link because it's not maintained anymore. I didn't add a Windows link because it's [not maintained anymore](https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/issues/1909#issuecomment-526943216).
Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already. Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already.
Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so. Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so.
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
- Individual sync conditions can be applied per device and per folder
- Recent changes UI, click to open files.
- "Battery eater" problem is fixed.
- Android 8 and 9 support.
We can address its removal in a separate PR 👍 We can address its removal in a separate PR :+1:
```suggestion
description="<strong>Syncthing</strong> replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and decentralized. Your data is your data alone and you deserve to choose where it is stored, if it is shared with some third-party and how it's transmitted over the Internet."
```
|
||||
</h1>
|
||||
|
||||
{%
|
||||
|
||||
|
TODO TODO
TODO TODO
TODO TODO
TODO TODO
I didn't add a Windows link because it's not maintained anymore. I didn't add a Windows link because it's [not maintained anymore](https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/issues/1909#issuecomment-526943216).
I didn't add a Windows link because it's not maintained anymore. I didn't add a Windows link because it's [not maintained anymore](https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/issues/1909#issuecomment-526943216).
Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already. Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already.
Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already. Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already.
Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so. Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so.
Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so. Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so.
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
- Individual sync conditions can be applied per device and per folder
- Recent changes UI, click to open files.
- "Battery eater" problem is fixed.
- Android 8 and 9 support.
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
- Individual sync conditions can be applied per device and per folder
- Recent changes UI, click to open files.
- "Battery eater" problem is fixed.
- Android 8 and 9 support.
We can address its removal in a separate PR 👍 We can address its removal in a separate PR :+1:
We can address its removal in a separate PR 👍 We can address its removal in a separate PR :+1:
```suggestion
description="<strong>Syncthing</strong> replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and decentralized. Your data is your data alone and you deserve to choose where it is stored, if it is shared with some third-party and how it's transmitted over the Internet."
```
```suggestion
description="<strong>Syncthing</strong> replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and decentralized. Your data is your data alone and you deserve to choose where it is stored, if it is shared with some third-party and how it's transmitted over the Internet."
```
|
||||
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
layout: page
|
||||
permalink: /software/file-sync/
|
||||
title: "File Sync Tools"
|
||||
title: "File Sync"
|
||||
description: "Discover free, open source, and secure ways to sync your files across your devices."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
TODO
TODO
TODO
TODO
I didn't add a Windows link because it's not maintained anymore.
I didn't add a Windows link because it's not maintained anymore.
Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already.
Hmm that's a good idea; didn't know about the fork. Judging by the versions of both listed on F-Droid, both share the same version: 1.2.2.3. So I'd assume the fork enhancements are layered over what's provided already.
Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so.
Based on the issues, PRs and lack of response also I'd think so.
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
Updated to point to the fork which has these enhancements:
We can address its removal in a separate PR 👍
We can address its removal in a separate PR 👍