2019-08-09 20:10:20 +00:00 · 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 · 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 · 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 · 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 · 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00
1 changed files with 36 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
+++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ labels: 🌐 website issue, 🗄️ DNS
 #### Desired features
-* [ ] QNAME minimization: YES or NO? <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
+* [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
`@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ labels: 🌐 website issue, 🗄️ DNS`
		Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox? nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?” nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?” Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I guess consistency I guess consistency Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I guess consistency I guess consistency nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Small suggestion: [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ``` nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Small suggestion: [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ``` Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Done Done Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Done Done

	`#### Desired features`		`#### Desired features`

	* [ ] QNAME minimization: YES or NO? <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->		* [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
		Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?” Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I guess consistency I guess consistency nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Small suggestion: [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ``` Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Done Done Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?” Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I guess consistency I guess consistency nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Small suggestion: [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ``` Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Done Done

		Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox? nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox? Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?” nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?” Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I guess consistency I guess consistency Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link I guess consistency I guess consistency nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Small suggestion: [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ``` nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Small suggestion: [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ``` Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Done Done Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com) Review Copy Link Done Done