Document the criteria for DNS servers #1111
2
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
vendored
@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ labels: 🌐 website issue, 🗄️ DNS
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
#### Desired features
|
||||
|
||||
* [ ] QNAME minimization: YES or NO? <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
|
||||
Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox?
Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?”
I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
I guess consistency I guess consistency
Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
Small suggestion: Small suggestion:
```markdown
[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
```
Done Done
|
||||
* [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
|
||||
|
Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox?
Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?”
I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
I guess consistency I guess consistency
Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
Small suggestion: Small suggestion:
```markdown
[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
```
Done Done
|
||||
|
||||
|
Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097) Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it? Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this. Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it? @nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
Yeah, I think so 👍🏼 Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox?
Could we make this also a checkbox? Could we make this also a checkbox?
Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?”
Do we mean “Android 9+?” Do we mean “Android 9+?”
I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
I guess consistency I guess consistency
I guess consistency I guess consistency
Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼 Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
Small suggestion: Small suggestion:
```markdown
[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
```
Small suggestion: Small suggestion:
```markdown
[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
```
Done Done
Done Done
|
||||
Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
Could we make this also a checkbox?
Could we make this also a checkbox?
Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
Do we mean “Android 9+?”
Do we mean “Android 9+?”
I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
I guess consistency
I guess consistency
Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
Small suggestion:
Small suggestion:
Done
Done