privacyguides/privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

Document the criteria for DNS servers #1111

Merged
Mikaela merged 8 commits from dns-criteria into master 2019-08-09 20:10:20 +00:00
Conversation 23 Commits 8 Files Changed 1 +36
1 changed files with 36 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit 2f9dd0ce76 - Show all commits

2
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md vendored
View File

@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ labels: 🌐 website issue, 🗄️ DNS
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Could we make this also a checkbox?

Could we make this also a checkbox?
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Could we make this also a checkbox?

Could we make this also a checkbox?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Do we mean “Android 9+?”

Do we mean “Android 9+?”
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Do we mean “Android 9+?”

Do we mean “Android 9+?”
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I guess consistency

I guess consistency
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I guess consistency

I guess consistency
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Small suggestion:

[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ```
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Small suggestion:

[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ```
Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Done

Done
Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Done

Done
<!-- DoH and DoT are supported natively by platforms like Firefox and Android (< 9) -->
* [ ] supports DoH or DoT <!-- We love DNSCrypt, but there is already https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-resolvers which is directly supported by dnscrypt-proxy, so we don't consider useful to list providers only supporting it. -->
* [ ] supports DNSSEC <!-- https://dnssec.vs.uni-due.de/ can test your current DNS provider. -->
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Could we make this also a checkbox?

Could we make this also a checkbox?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Do we mean “Android 9+?”

Do we mean “Android 9+?”
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I guess consistency

I guess consistency
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Small suggestion:

[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ```
Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Done

Done
* [ ] no PII logs <!-- TODO: read Quad9/Cloudflare/etc. to define this! -->
#### Desired features
* DNSSEC support: YES or NO? <!-- https://dnssec.vs.uni-due.de/ can test your current DNS provider. -->
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Could we make this also a checkbox?

Could we make this also a checkbox?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Do we mean “Android 9+?”

Do we mean “Android 9+?”
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

I guess consistency

I guess consistency
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
nitrohorse commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Small suggestion:

[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ```
Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review
Copy Link

Done

Done
* QNAME minimization: YES or NO? <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->