💬 Discussion | Dual Licensing #996

Closed
opened 2019-06-17 02:18:40 +00:00 by ghbjklhv · 4 comments
ghbjklhv commented 2019-06-17 02:18:40 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I wanted to start a discussion about the possibility of dual licensing privacytools.io

The current CC0 contains much unnecessary legal lingo and can be confusing.
Although, under some circumstances this may be useful.

My recommendation is to dual license under a simpler license such as the Unlicense.
https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-licensing

I wanted to start a discussion about the possibility of dual licensing privacytools.io The current CC0 contains much unnecessary legal lingo and can be confusing. Although, under some circumstances this may be useful. My recommendation is to dual license under a simpler license such as the [Unlicense](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlicense#License_terms). https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-licensing
ghost commented 2019-06-17 04:38:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlicense#Reception sounds like CC0 might be a better choice even if it's more legalese.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlicense#Reception sounds like CC0 might be a better choice even if it's more legalese.
Mikaela commented 2019-06-17 07:31:49 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Duplicate or discussed previously _at least_ in https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/957 https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/956 https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/955
ghbjklhv commented 2019-06-19 01:49:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@Mikaela This is not a duplicate.
#957 #956 and #955 are about separate licenses.
I propose the idea of using multi-licensing, which doesn't seem to have been discussed before.

@Mikaela This is not a duplicate. #957 #956 and #955 are about separate licenses. I propose the idea of using multi-licensing, which doesn't seem to have been discussed before.
Mikaela commented 2019-06-20 22:06:08 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@ghbjklhv What benefit do you see coming from multi licensing as CC0 and something that almost everyone else opposes? Especially considering how CC0 is public domain even if your legislation didn't happen to understand public domain and thus allows you to do anything you want with it.

@ghbjklhv What benefit do you see coming from multi licensing as CC0 and something that almost everyone else opposes? Especially considering how CC0 is public domain even if your legislation didn't happen to understand public domain and thus allows you to do anything you want with it.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#996
No description provided.