✨ Feature Suggestion | Guest-of-the-Month #972
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#972
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description: continuation of a discussion in #848
@JonahAragon -- here is a good person to ask: Fredrik Strömberg, co-founder of Mullvad, in the VPN provider listings since forever, contact info at top of the PDF that was just released, https://www.mullvad.net/media/system-transparency-rev4.pdf where they are talking about building a cryptographically-provable no-logging-VPN (with similar but not identical technology to how signal-server uses server-side SGX enclaves to give client-side signal4smartphone the ability to perform remote-attestation before uploading the addressbook hashnums -- assuming one enables addressbook integration of course, it is on-by-default but optional).
Because mullvad is making a publicity-push right now, specifically appealing to "reviewers" aka privacyToolsIO folks with their objective-listings-hats on their heads, they might be receptive to guest-blogger-of-the-month sort of arrangement? == https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2019/6/3/system-transparency-future/ (which I heard about here) You can toss a few stock questions every guest-blogger gets asked --
-- then dive straight into their personal-opinion listing of tool-recommendations for everyday citizenry. They can annotate their listings with rationale, or discussion, or whatever, or if they are in a hurry just ram it out with "best tool for non-tech-savvy and best tool for more-advanced endusers" in each category they care to make a statement about.
p.s. Also, still strongly recommend asking Snowden and maybe Schneier. Worst they can do, is tell you to stop bothering them please :-) But they might say "okay"
We decided that this currently to big of a hassle with our current resources. It may be an idea for the future though, closing for now.