🆕 Software Suggestion | Add loki-net #924
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#924
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
So where would one add this, self contained networks? Also I would feel a bit uncomfortable with adding new networks, atleast not without some big warnings.
What is it and why should it be added? Is it more like Tor or I2P? What makes it in-scope unlike https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/685? Also https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/798.
It's an evolved I2P for me. Seems related to #685 but not to #798 IMHO
As the initiator of the issue seems to be unresponsive and provides no real case to add loki, ill close this issue. If anyone disagrees, they can comment to ask for it to open up again.
Hey, CTO of the Loki project here (We develop Lokinet), just noticed this issue. We will be making a more official posting when Lokinet has reached a stable release. For now this issue can remain closed