✨ Feature Suggestion | Maturity/independant audit matrix #753
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#753
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description:
I think it might be useful to score the listed applications on software maturity, security maturity and or whether the software had an independent audit. Maybe starting out making a large spreadsheet (is that easy/possible on GitHub??) to list the software so we want to rate/check.
What do you guys think about this suggestion?
Interesting idea. @Shifterovich maybe this could be implemented using labels?
Sounds like a good use case for them. Any information that can be highlighted in < 3 words and differentiates a certain piece of software from the others in the same category fits can be put into the label.
I think most issues regarding maturity have been addressed on the site, and we now use labels fairly comprehensively regarding potential issues with tools. For security audits specifically let's move the conversation to #1071.