Feature Suggestion | SCAPS transparency and avoidance #745

Closed
opened 2019-01-26 03:24:40 +00:00 by pdjpdjpdj · 1 comment
pdjpdjpdj commented 2019-01-26 03:24:40 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Description:

I think we should be

  1. Avoiding as much ties with Surveillance Capitalism Corporations (SCAPS e.g. GAFA, Alibaba, Tencent, Samsung,...)
  2. Being transparent about potential exceptions:
  • Facebook page (as of now still required to reach a broad audience imho) - Needs new issue?
  • Github (status of Microsoft (GAFAM) while far better than Google/Facebook is not clear to me yet they have pros and cons) - see #742
## Description: I think we should be 1) Avoiding as much ties with Surveillance Capitalism Corporations (SCAPS e.g. GAFA, Alibaba, Tencent, Samsung,...) 2) Being transparent about potential exceptions: - Facebook page (as of now still required to reach a broad audience imho) - Needs new issue? - Github (status of Microsoft (GAFA**M**) while far better than Google/Facebook is not clear to me yet they have pros and cons) - see #742

There are already open issues elsewhere regarding our use of GitHub, etc.

There are already open issues elsewhere regarding our use of GitHub, etc.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#745
No description provided.