🆕 Software Suggestion | Ecosia search engine #682
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#682
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Basic Information
Name: Ecosia
Category: Search engine
URL: https://www.ecosia.org/
About URL https://info.ecosia.org/
Description
Ecosia is an search engine planting trees with the money they make. They appear to be transparent releasing financial documents at https://documents.ecosia.org/467540 (however I didn't read any).
Their privacy policy looks OK to me, https://info.ecosia.org/privacy . However their results come from Bing, but that is also one of the sources of DuckDuckGo.
I found the project very interesting a few years ago, but not being able to change the source of the search results was a deal breaker for me.
They have a decent privacy policy: https://tosdr.org/#ecosia
But are non-free, therefore don't meet the software criteria.
DuckDuckGo and StartPage.com are also non-free as far as I can see?
Oh, you opened https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/pull/699 and forgot to mention it here.
Ecosia has always been hostile toward Tor users which makes it a non-starter from a privacy viewpoint.
ATM it's just dropping packets from Tor and timing out, which IMO is even less diplomacy than a "403 forbidden".
(edit) actually just now it was very slow but served my Tor packets okay for the 1 query I tried. So I'm not sure if Ecosia is still mistreating Tor users these days.
(update 2019-03-26) Ecosia was working from tor for a couple weeks. And now it's really hit and miss. Tor users can enter a search criteria, but upon submission 1 of 4 things happens:
It's totally unacceptable that in the first two cases they present a query field. If you're going to deny me service or put me through hoops, be up front about it. To collect the query first and then reject or inconvenience after I took the time to write out a query, it's a waste of my time. They get the benefit of recording search phrase popularity stats but the user does not get the benefit of the results.
The CAPTCHA itself benefits google, who monatizes the puzzle and also gathers data about who is accessing the page, which can be further monatized.
Ecosia is using CloudFlare (not good) for their financial reports
From a financial PoV, Ecosia is feeding both microsoft and google. DDG is much worse, but Startpage and searx are relatively better IMO.
https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/pull/960#issuecomment-498073312 ?
Why reopen this @Mikaela ?
From the comment of the ghost user looks like Ecosia is not Tor-friendly, which IMO is a big "no no" if we are talking about user privacy. I don't think that them being non-free was the stopper here.
I don't think we have a formal rule of search engines needing to be Tor friendly in order to be listed. To quote myself from the forum:
What do you think @privacytoolsIO/editorial ?
I'm confused now. Isn't this Privacytools.io? Shouldn't this community suggest the best tools to protect people's privacy?
You don't need a formal rule. Supporting Tor is a big point if you are proposing a privacy-oriented browser, planting trees is not...
You are not addressing any of the legit concerns pointed out by the ghost user, but you are reopening this issue anyway. I understand you like Ecosia for the ideology behind it, but that's offtopic. I share your concerns for the environment, but you are suggesting Privacy tools to a wide audience here, you have responsabilities. I don't think would be wise to ignore the concerns about privacy because "You are more worried about the climate change".
Case closed, see comments here and https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/pull/1036#pullrequestreview-263991424 & below.