Should Seafile really be the first choice for a self-hosted cloud solution? You be the judge. #465
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#465
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
https://github.com/haiwen/seafile/issues/350
Edit: See below comment
I respect that this issue needs attention drawn to it, though I'm not so sure this is really a useful issue to open.More people should be aware of this before making a choice which self hosting cloud they want to use.
@RichardRMatthews My apologies - I mistakenly thought this was an open issue on the actual haiwen/seafile repo (and therefore thought you'd just opened a duplicate issue to reference the original issue); was a derp on my end. I can totally see the relevance here :) Ignore me!
No problem , everyone mixes things up. Have a nice day!
You too :)
Seafile was removed in #491.