Ghostbin #408

Closed
opened 2018-03-16 13:06:02 +00:00 by huubert · 6 comments
huubert commented 2018-03-16 13:06:02 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Ghostbin is not really secure, because after creating an encrypted paste, it's possible to access it with javascript disabled, which means the content is not decrypted in the user's browser. Also, it requires cookies to even work at all, which shouldn't be needed.

Ghostbin is not really secure, because after creating an encrypted paste, it's possible to access it with javascript disabled, which means the content is not decrypted in the user's browser. Also, it requires cookies to even work at all, which shouldn't be needed.
Hillside502 commented 2018-03-16 20:17:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Open Source Ghostbin Alternatives - AlternativeTo.net
https://alternativeto.net/software/ghostbin/?license=opensource

Open Source Ghostbin Alternatives - AlternativeTo.net https://alternativeto.net/software/ghostbin/?license=opensource
ghost commented 2018-03-16 21:57:17 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

It can be self-hosted, though, if you're concerned about server-side security. But yeah, we're just recommending the main server.

It can be self-hosted, though, if you're concerned about server-side security. But yeah, we're just recommending the main server.
huubert commented 2018-03-17 16:27:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I don't consider that secure, but maybe it's just me...
Regardless, Ghostbin should be the third option in the Paste Services section and not the first, and maybe it should be mentioned in the notes that encryption/decryption is not done in the browser.

I don't consider that secure, but maybe it's just me... Regardless, Ghostbin should be the third option in the Paste Services section and not the first, and maybe it should be mentioned in the notes that encryption/decryption is not done in the browser.
ghost commented 2018-05-10 08:58:34 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Just FYI:
ghostbin.com runs outdated Apache 2.4.18 and outdated OpenSSH 7.2 P2. The security of the whole server setup isn't very exemplary. Furthermore, the TLS configuration supports insecure RC4 for encryption and weak cipher suites.

Just FYI: ghostbin.com runs outdated [Apache 2.4.18](https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-45/product_id-66/version_id-199589/Apache-Http-Server-2.4.18.html) and outdated [OpenSSH 7.2 P2](https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-97/product_id-585/version_id-194112/Openbsd-Openssh-7.2.html). The security of the [whole server setup](https://www.htbridge.com/websec/?id=rYAkummU) isn't very exemplary. Furthermore, the TLS configuration [supports insecure RC4 for encryption and weak cipher suites](https://tls.imirhil.fr/https/ghostbin.com).
ghost commented 2018-05-27 06:52:38 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

See also my comparison in #454

See also [my comparison](https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/454#issuecomment-385314214) in #454
Vincevrp commented 2019-02-28 19:46:32 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Discussion can continue in #454

Discussion can continue in #454
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#408
No description provided.