Add PGP and GPG tutorials to the website. #347
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
(4-month-old) background here:
Both PGP and GPG tutorials are good-enough-to-be-published now.
Links:
Any ideas on how to include the tutorials (the links to the tutorials)?
Maybe add them to the description of GPG and other PGP tools?Add another button?Searching a few engines, I see that the words commonly used with PGP are "guide", "tutorial", "how to". Having this in mind, maybe we could add a button that'd link to the tutorial? I assume we'd want it to stand out in the crowd.
Sorry, I forgot, my original idea was a button next to the one that redirects the user to the website. Edited.
Thanks.
@hugoncosta I will create a PR tomorrow.
Should we link to the PGP tutorial as well? Or is a link in the GPG tutorial enough?
Well, explaining PGP wouldn't be a tool. I think we think put up the GPG tutorial and in the first paragraph or so create a link to the PGP tutorial. "GPG is a tool that bla bla bla using PGP. But what is PGP? Read more about (link)here(/link)"
I guess this is enough.
Well, taking into account this is targeted to "normal" people, that usually don't care about what's behind something, as long as it works, I believe that making them "learn" about PGP before using GPG might be a waste. I imagine someone accessing the GPG tutorial, start reading the PGP tutorial and just say "this is too hard to understand, the programme must be even harder, ahhh f$$k it."
With this, I just reinforce my opinion that we should give them advices on tools, not necessarily on what's behind them.
Good luck understanding public key crypto, revocation certs, etc.
No point in explaining stuff twice. Theory is explained in the PGP tutorial, GPG syntax in the GPG one.
You indeed have a point, I forgot about that. Than yeah, I guess it's needed that they understand at least the syntax/basic concepts behind PGP to work with GPG.