📝 Correction | Tangible reason for Brave's removal #2372
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2372
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
In the pull request for Brave's removal, there is a Reddit thread linked which was meant to poll the community on whether to remove or not. A lot of comments were advocating against the removal, citing an easier switch from Chrome to Brave for less tech-knowledgeable/people starting out and the lack of evidence for Brave being the ad centric company it is often made out to be.
Why I am making the suggestion
I do not see a reason for its removal. Just because Mozilla is more trustworthy doesn't mean Brave shouldn't even be listed in the 'Worth Mentioning" section. After setting up both Brave and Firefox multiple times in accordance to the PTIO guide, Brave is easier to harden.
My connection with the software
I use both Brave and Firefox
Please don't open up new issues regarding old topics.