✨ Feature Suggestion | Comprehensive software comparison page #2344
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2344
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
While having a clean interface that can suggest one, two, or three software applications for a specific purpose is a great idea for those looking to start in the world of privacy, I'd like to see some more information for advanced users. This comes from my frustrating search to find and categorize all the privacy-focused messaging applications out there, turns out there are quite a few of them, they all have trade-offs, and a lot of these trade-offs can only be found in the nitty-gritty like whitepapers, technical documents, and git issues (including many discussions on this repo!). Instead of just having a user being told whats best for them, what if we include another page that goes into the details of these different software specifications and scorecard them like what the EFF used to do. While other pages exist that include their own scorecards, they are scattered, they lack certain markers, they lack certain software to compare, and most importantly they are not open-source for contribution. This page doesn't have to be front and center, but just an extra page to create a standing catalogue of what is out there and help advanced users determine what is the most private and anonymous software for their threat-model.
I was beginning to create my own page for this information with a table to display at the top, citations to each claim, and possibly an appendix for more complex discussion matters (#2293). However I'd rather contribute to an existing well-known project that have another small independent one where it may not get as much contribution.
Here is a sample unfinished scorecard for messaging platforms: https://cryptpad.fr/sheet/#/2/sheet/edit/CUkoArq1ja21SWr7rQBPeRg7/
IMHO (and I'm not part of PTIO team, just an infrequent contributor), such a scoreboard leads to several issues:
Don't get me wrong, it's great such scoreboards exist and I certainly find them, such as yours, very useful and helpful (thank you for sharing!), but I don't think that it's in PTIO's interest or philosophy to include them. But that's only my opinion.
As someone who is a part of the PrivacyTools team, I reiterate @lrq3000's points.
We're currently facing some large scale organisational problems, which is why there is such as backlog. Hopefully things will be resolved soon, and we can all get back to working on the site.
As for this issue, I'll be closing it - but feel free to discuss further, and mention me if you have any incredible ideas.