❌ Software Removal | Signal #2308
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2308
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
I suggest removing Signal.
Why I am making the suggestion
At least on Android, it asks for a Google Captcha when I sign up.
This is undesirable from a privacy perspective.
My connection with the software
user
Duplicate of #779
I'm by no means a Signal fan but removing it is a bad idea because it's one of the better and most useable privacy messengers currently available. Lots of people seem to praise Element, but I've had problems like messages never being decrypted to the point that it was pointless using the platform. The element-web GitHub repo has nearly 5,000 open issues, so I'm clearly not the only person experiencing problems. Then the peer-to-peer messengers on the PrivacyTools website have limited use cases, with Briar only being available on Android. The current state of messengers is messy, much like the situation with browsers.
Duplicate of #779