❌ Software Removal | Aether #2253
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2253
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
well, i mostly wanted for someone to confirm or dismiss my concerns about Aether
Why I am making the suggestion
on the Aether site here https://getaether.net/dmca/
they state
If you send a DMCA request, and it is found to be valid, the content you’ve requested the Takedown for will be taken down from the servers Aether Technologies Inc. controls, if present, and a block will be placed on the identifier (“Fingerprint”) of the content, so that Aether clients will not download, make visible to the user, or share the fingerprinted content.
this is literally plain censorship.
dmca as other "copyright laws" are tools that can be abused even by individuals, not counting whole governments.
though the software is for now opensourced, and that means anyone can modify code to ignore those "fingerprints" - i doubt the majority of users will use anything but the one official client
My connection with the software
no connection to this software, just a concerned citizen
Lol, that is not censorship, do you have an idea of how many libre projects would die if they would not comply to copyright laws? Even more, libre licenses are there exactly to do something similar, if someone uses your code without following the guidelines of your license you can ask a store to take down that project or sue the individual.
It is literally impossible except for pirate zones to not comply with DCMAs, and even in some cases torrent indexers remove that content, if you would like that to not exist don't conplain with this dev but with how capitalism works.
Regarding the "fingerprint" I imagine they refer to how a post/user is handled in the code, wich most probably translates into a string of numbers or letters, which is needed for the software to work.
Free software doesn't grant you permission to break the law, regardless of ones feelings towards a particular law. It's not censorship simply because they don't want to face legal consequences of their users. Though, here I am explaining laws to a pedophile horse.
@LongJohn-Silver true, that is not censorship YET. that is a tool for censorship, and how it is used is in hands of the project owners, and at this point - it's no different than twitter or similars. Your country is one bad election away from starting to abuse those laws, like some others do
@danarel hey! it's "children's horse"!
@pedohorse It is not in the hands of the project owner, it is in the hands of copyright holders, no one will DMCA you unless you are piracying, the only thing the developer can do is to accept the takedown or face legal consequences for their users' actions.
I do agree with you that the DMCA is an unjust law to benefit copyright lobbyists, but you are getting it all wrong and it is an off topic discussion for this.
well, i'm not specifically worried about DMCA - it doesn't even exist in some countries. I'm afraid of the fact that there is a way to dictate what is allowed what is not. Authoritarian governments have proven multiple times they will invent and use laws to take down any content they don't want online, all "perfectly legally".
So i was looking at aether as a government censorship resilient tool, which it clearly isn't (by multiple factors, including this one).
my mistake