Archived
✨ Feature Suggestion | Linux desktop environment section? #2221
Open
opened 2021-03-01 12:24:40 +00:00 by ghost
·
5 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
dependabot/bundler/nokogiri-1.13.6
dependabot/bundler/addressable-2.8.0
freddy-m-patch-3
pr-add_RemoveMyPhone_sponsor
pr-browser_cleanup_1257_1328_1430
freddy-m-patch-2
freddy-m-patch-1
pr-vpn_hated_one_video
cdn
update-nitrohorse-image
promote-metager-to-card
hardware
pr-add_azirevpn
pr-add_mailfence
shop
1673
pr/1658
i18n-simple
sponsorship-edits-nov2019
i18n
ipfs
blacklight447-ptio-patch-3
blog
remove-windows-icons
pr/1147
i18n-testing
add-beautify
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
:mag:🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
approved, waiting for a PR
Pull requests that update a dependency file
The Invisible Internet Project (I2P)
Operating Systems
A label for stalebot if it gets added
Anything related to media streaming.
Anything covering the Tor network
active work in progress, do not merge or PR (yet)!
Issues or bugs that will not be fixed and/or do not have significant impact on the project.
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
Matrix protocol
Browser Extension related issues
Correction of content on the website
Firefox & forks, about:config etc.
Anything primarily related to site cleanup.
Virtual Private Network
*Technical* issues with the website.
Domain Name System
Anything covering a translated version of the site
No labels
✨ enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2221
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Description
I've been looking into a few desktop environments for my Linux distro (Arch). I've been particularly interested in KDE Plasma, but I've found that an application, ksysguard (the task manager) depends on libksysguard, which in turn depends on qt5-webengine, which 'provides support for web applications using the Chromium browser project'.
This has made me think about which desktop environments may not be as privacy-friendly as others. Even if it is only a very minor dependency, I still reckon stuff like this should be looked into and a list compiled. What do you think?
I think these factors are very interesting (to me at least) and matter to loads of people. I would love there to be a section about it.
However I've heard repeated ( tell me if I am wrong ) that privacytools.io is meant as a resource primarily for the 'noobs' - between - reasonably tech savvy individual.
This would perhaps fall under a more advanced topic and material which might not mash with the main theme of the site?
I am all for perhaps a section somewhere on the site which would open up a portal towards these kinds of topics for those of us and everyone out there which do dive deeper into these topics or would like to and learn about it.
Should I create a separate issue for this?
@GintokiHub I never really got that feel from the site myself - this is the same site I'd heard about Arch Linux from, after all.
The way I see it is; if the site suggests distros which either come with a DE or allow you to choose your own (pretty much all of them, albeit Arch and Alpine being the only ones actually requiring you to) then it would be nice to be warned about the privacy implications of each, and steps you could take to mitigate it.
I think the Operating System should be split into "Beginner, Novice, Advance" or something similar and add more potential operating systems for them. Going from point-click to fully terminal installation will be horrible for many. Grouping them into levels, you will know at least where to start when you want to become more privacy aware.
I would like to install Arch but i don't know what desktop environment i need. Any privacy focused recommendations?
I lean more towards having one category for "Desktop Linux distros" (or something to that effect), instead of splitting it up into "Introductory" and "Advanced". But there could be a tag/ranking/star system for each that said something about how beginner friendly it is. Ubuntu and Linux Mint (if added), would probably be for "Beginners", while something like Arch is "Advanced". Then instead try to rank the distros on privacy alone, at least if there are tangible differences between them, a bit akin to for browsers.
I'm honestly not sure how the different distros rank privacy-wise, but unless there is something inherently bad about distros like Linux Mint and Manjaro, I reckon it makes sense to mention them, since they are both rather popular distros. At least if going by distrowatch or gamingonlinux
I currently use Linux Mint myself, and have "mono-booted" it for years while being a noob, so I can vouch for it being beginner friendly. Have never tried Manjaro so not sure where that would rank.