Reopen Vivaldi Browser Issues #2209

Closed
opened 2021-02-13 22:40:59 +00:00 by KosmoEskudo · 3 comments
KosmoEskudo commented 2021-02-13 22:40:59 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Please reopen https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/issues/2206 (more recent) or https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/pull/717 , since no one has said a why not to include it. I have researched Vivaldi, and have written up my findings in this article and I don't see a why not to include it.

The only thing that has been said is that it is closed source, and this issue is explained by Vivaldi here.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator

Please reopen https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/issues/2206 (more recent) or https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/pull/717 , since no one has said a *why* not to include it. I have researched Vivaldi, and have written up my findings in [this article](https://write.privacytools.io/kolivro/vivaldi-and-privacy) and I don't see a *why* not to include it. The only thing that has been said is that it is closed source, and this issue is explained by Vivaldi [here](https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-browser-open-source/). Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator
t1011 commented 2021-02-14 17:28:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Ridiculous excuses. Even if there is 0.00001% closed source code, it is still impossible to recommend this browser.

Ridiculous excuses. Even if there is 0.00001% closed source code, it is still impossible to recommend this browser.
Evernow commented 2021-02-17 03:53:56 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

The only thing that has been said is that it is closed source, and this issue is explained by Vivaldi here.

All yes, which basically sums down to "We use open source code in our closed source browser, so it's ok"

By that logic iOS should be recommended since it uses open source parts in its closed source OS.

Give me a break, come back when we can have fully reproducable builds of it, like we do for firefox

> The only thing that has been said is that it is closed source, and this issue is explained by Vivaldi here. All yes, which basically sums down to "We use open source code in our closed source browser, so it's ok" By that logic iOS should be recommended [since it uses open source parts in its closed source OS](https://developer.apple.com/opensource/). Give me a break, come back when we can have fully reproducable builds of it, like we do for [firefox](https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/bullseye/amd64/index_reproducible.html)
freddy-m commented 2021-02-20 12:32:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@KosmoEskudo please don't comment on every thread with Vivaldi in it. It isn't helpful. I appreciate the work that you have putten into this, however we won't be listing Vivaldi in the near future.

@KosmoEskudo please don't comment on every thread with Vivaldi in it. It isn't helpful. I appreciate the work that you have putten into this, however we won't be listing Vivaldi in the near future.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2209
No description provided.